WSP10064

• File Number: 8112.600
• Description: Arkansas White Red Basins Interagency Committee - AWRBIAC -- Reports
• Basin: Arkansas
• Water Division: 2
• Date: 4/1/1977
• Title: Technical Memorandum -- Activity 3 Phase II -- Specific Problem Analysis - 1975 National Assessment -- Arkansas-White-Red Region Part 1 of 2
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Report/Study

o
r:)
N
o
(IJ
w

Problem Area 4 - ASA 1105, Problem 7 (Canadian River above
Canadian County in Ok13homa)

ASA 1105, Problem 8 (Canadian River Basin)

Problem Area 5 - ASA 1106, Problem 9 (Upper Washita River Basin
above Grady County)
ASA 1106, Problem 10 (lower Washita)
ASA 1106, Problem 11 (Lake Texoma)
ASA 1106, Prob lem 12 (Elm Fork)

Problem Area 6 - ASA 1107, Problem 13 (Red River below Denison
Dam)

Supporting information relating to the negative effects of
these problem areas have been developed for those portions of each
problem area not adequately being addressed by on-going Federal/
State programs. For those portions within each problem area not
discussed, solutions to the problems are known. All that is re-
quired is implementation of the programs.

Problem No.1, High Plains Groundwater Irrigation, is expected
to receive considerable attention through the Economic Development
Administration' 5 proposed "High Plains Project.1I

TEXAS

Five problem areas were identified in Activity 2 in ASA's 1105, 1106,
and 1107. Two problems have been added that are of State-wide concern --
"Flood problems" and "Water Supply and Quality Problems as a Consequence
of 'Implementing the 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act.

Three problems, "Flood Problems," "Water Supply and Quality Problems
in Small Cities and Rural Communities as a Consequence of Safe Drinking
Water Ac t;' and "Groundwater Depletion Problems in the Texas High Plains
are "Group A" problems.

While all seven problems are of concern to Texas, the Group B problems
are now so classed because they are being adequately addressed by an on-
going or recently completed study with timely solutions proposed by either
Federal or non-Federal entities. "Group A" problems are so considered by
Texas because they are currently unresolved and are not being adequately
addressed by an on-going or recently completed study, with no timely resolute
actions by either Federal or non-Federal entities.

4

~

I

'.
)

I
:1

I

I

I

I

:1

\1

I

I

I

<I

.
I

I