Laserfiche WebLink
<br />W Table 2. - Average annual reductions in energy generation at <br />~ Hoover and Parker-Davis Powerplants due to emerging energy <br />-J development in the Upper Colorado River Region <br />0) <br /> <br />Item <br /> <br />Reduction <br />generated <br />19S5 <br /> <br />in energy <br />(GWh) 1./ <br />2000 <br /> <br />Value of average annual <br />energy reduction 2/ <br />(in $1,000) - <br />1985 2000 <br /> <br />Alternative I 3/ <br /> <br />Hoover <br />Parker-Davi s <br />Total <br /> <br />14 <br />5 <br />19 <br /> <br />Alternative II 4/ <br /> <br />Hoover <br />Parker-Davi s <br />Total <br /> <br />15 <br />4 <br />19 <br /> <br />Alternative III ~/ <br /> <br />Hoover <br />Parker-Davi s <br />Total <br /> <br />g <br />1 <br />TO <br /> <br />144 <br />25 <br />169 <br /> <br />$570 <br /> <br />$5,070 <br /> <br />199 <br />30 <br />229 <br /> <br />570 <br /> <br />6,870 <br /> <br />194 <br />40 <br />234 <br /> <br />300 <br /> <br />7,020 <br /> <br />1/ Results of linear regression of output of CRSS model to dampen <br />vari at ion in annual averages. <br />2/ Estimated power value of 30 mills/kWh. Values have not been <br />discounted or adjusted for inflation. <br />3/ Medium rate of energy development with low water depletion. <br />4/ Accelerated rate'of energy development with medium water depletion. <br />I/ Accelerated rate of energy development with high water depletion. <br /> <br />15 <br />