Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ head developed at the powerplant. This head depends upon the <br />---J <br />~ elevation of the reservoir and as both the water supply and <br /> <br />reservoir conditions vary between alternatives, there is no way <br /> <br />that the power generated by the different alternatives would be <br />the same. <br /> <br />Impacts on CAP Agricultural Water Users. - Agricultural impacts <br />would result from reductions in water delivery to CAP and from <br />increased salinity levels for all Lower Region users. CAP will <br />just be coming on-line in 1985 and will not be able to utilize <br />its full allocation; therefore, any shortage at that time will <br />have no impact on CAP agriculture. By year 2000, however, <br />reductions in agricultural water supply to CAP will be signifi- <br />cant for each of the three alternative rates of energy develop- <br /> <br />ment, given the projected "without EET" conditions. <br /> <br />Table 3 presents the reduction in agricultural water supply and <br /> <br />associated monetary impacts incurred by CAP farmers. Since this <br /> <br />study does not project beyond year. 2000, CAP farmers can increase <br /> <br />ground-water pumping to make up for the reduction in CAP water. <br /> <br />It is expected that as accelerated pumping continues beyond year <br /> <br /> <br />2000, the impacts will increase rapidly but analysis of that <br /> <br />situation is beyond the scope of this study. <br /> <br />The total changes in income for the agricultural industry for the <br />three projected alternative levels of energy development range <br /> <br />16 <br />