Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Process Towards Integrated Resource Plan <br />-Research Component- <br /> <br />Environmental Technical <br />Working Group-Research .. <br /> <br />Executive Review .. <br />Committee <br /> <br />NAS <br />Committee <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />J! <br />.f . <br /> <br />1-1 <br /> <br />c: <br />o <br />.. <br />.. <br />li> <br />. <br />~ <br />.E <br />"- <br />c: <br />.2 <br />~ <br />.. <br />.s; <br />... <br />~ <br />o <br />o <br />C) <br /> <br />program with the operations ofGIen <br />Canyon Dam. <br /> <br />It is important though that we not <br />think of the Integrated Research <br />Plan as the panacea or guarantee <br />for the successful completion of all <br />of the GeES Phase II research. For <br />centuries, planners have sought to <br />endow planning activities with rigid <br />scientific criteria, on the <br />assumption that their findings <br />would increase credibility and <br />acceptance by the political decision <br />makers. 'file development of the <br />GeES Integrated Research Plan <br />must be viewed as a continuum of <br />process, and not as an inviolate set <br />of projects. This will create an <br />opportunity to plan for better <br /> <br />Economic Technical <br />. Working Group-Research <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />~ GCES <br />Program <br />Menager <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Senior Scientist ... <br /> <br />I "'Res <br />~ Adv <br />Integrated <br />Research <br />Plan <br />1 990-1 <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />Research <br />1990+ <br />! <br /> <br />earch <br />Isory Panel <br />'" <br />. <br />< <br />cr <br />t: <br />- <br /> <br />Integrated <br />Research <br /> <br /> <br />Rerts <br /> <br />Integrated <br />Resource <br />Management Plan <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />implementation of <br />Integrated Resource <br />Management Plan <br /> <br />Figrm:2 <br /> <br />science with better management <br />decisions. <br /> <br />At the last GOES technical <br />meetings in Flagstaff, Dr. Patten <br />presented a chart (Figure 2) which <br />outlined the means by which the <br />Senior Scientist will help to develop <br />and provide input into the GeES <br />technical program. <br /> <br />The graph reflects part of the <br />process which is to be followed in <br />the development of the Integrated <br />Research Plan. Three key groups to <br />be involved include: the Senior <br />Scientist, and the Environmental <br />and Economic Study Teams. <br />Providing review and oversight <br />functions, will be the Senior <br /> <br />f <br />I <br /> <br />Scientist's Research Advisory <br />Panel, the National Academy of <br />Sciences Review Committee, the <br />GeES Program Manager, and the <br />Executive Review Committee. <br /> <br />It is anticipated that by having the <br />core of the integrated plan <br />developed by the scientists, that a <br />complete and integrated research <br />program will be developed. The <br />review groups wiIl provide the <br />oversight to ensure that all of the <br />details have been addressed, and <br />that the program can be <br />implemented. Once the Integrated <br />Research Plan is developed, then <br />the development of the individual <br />Requests for Proposals, contracts, <br />and budgets can be established. <br /> <br />'" <br />~ <br />f <br /> <br />Summary of GeES <br /> <br />River Research Trips <br /> <br />Humpback Chub Trip Lee's <br /> <br />Ferry to Diamond Creek: <br />May 15-29, 1989 <br /> <br />The Humpback Ohub (lIBO) <br />research trip included participants <br />from, Arizona Game & Fish <br />Department (AGF), BioWest, <br />Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), Fish <br />& Wildlife Service (FWS), Natiol1al <br />Park Service, (NPS), and the <br />Navajo Natural Heritage Program. <br /> <br />The major objective of the trip was <br />to measure distribution, <br />abundance, population structure, <br />reproductive activity, age/growth <br />relationships, and movement of the. <br />HBO. Research was focused on the <br />Little Oolorado River (LOR) for five <br />days, and in the mainstem, <br />secondary tributaries, and <br />backwaters for the remainder of the <br />trip. OoncuITent1y, AGF personnel <br />were working in the LOR drainage <br />from May 1-30. Passive Integrated <br />Transponder (Pl'fJ tags were <br />injected into the coelomic cavity of <br />the HBO (rather than sew-on Oadin <br />and Floy fingerling tags). <br /> <br />A total ofl,8871IBO were collected, <br />33% were tagged this year, 33% <br />were recaptured (tagged in 1986, <br />1987, and 1988). 'rhere was an 11% <br />return on the PIT tagged fish. <br />Spawning had apparently occurred <br />during April. Thermal shock <br /> <br />3 <br />