My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09291
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:52:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:34:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.200.05.P
Description
Hoover Dam/Lake Mead/Boulder Canyon Project
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/3/1979
Author
USACOE
Title
Transcript of a Public Hearing for Re-evaluation of A Flood Control Operation Plan for Hoover Dam: Yuma AZ
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />('I') <br />.' <br />0'> <br />.C\l <br />c. <br /> <br />...., <br /> <br />'J ,. <br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1-- ---,..-------.-..~--- -..----.---..~-----.------ <br /> <br />54 <br /> <br />level is encroached upon where we're basically moving in on <br /> <br />a, almost a no trespass area just based on the River itself. <br /> <br />But, it seems to me that in the future we need to study the <br /> <br />question of the legality of moving in on the limits of the <br /> <br />River's normal flow, particularly as it relates to the flood <br /> <br />";: control potential for the dam that was upstream that is <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />;[) <br />. ': <br /> <br />...., <br /> <br />being considered at this point. <br /> <br />Let's take -- for instance, let's take the dam out <br /> <br />of there. And you now have the raging torrent and you have <br /> <br />the drought. Obviously if you move in on that floodplain <br /> <br />I doubt very much if the people that are in the floodplain <br /> <br />today, realizing that periodically the River would go into <br /> <br />this type of a condition, would very likely risk the chance <br /> <br />II of being wiped out by moving in there. And so, looking at <br /> <br />. <br />" <br /> <br />}., <br /> <br />I"~ I <br />" <br /> <br />I') <br /> <br />>, I <br /> <br /> , <br /> II <br />., I <br /> I! <br /> " <br />., I 'I <br />- " <br /> " <br /> " <br />-- " <br />, , <br />-" 'I <br /> I, <br /> ': <br /> !I <br /> " <br /> <br />it from the standpoint of a limited liability it seems like <br /> <br />it's still a better part of wisdom not to move in there. <br /> <br />But I would personally like to recommend some type <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />of an investigation as to what constitutes a legal limit <br /> <br />of a river boundary, shoreline, I guess, if we wish to put <br /> <br />it that way, in relation to the upstream flood release <br /> <br />requirements. And just as a final comment I would like to <br /> <br />say this, that based on the needs of the people in this <br /> <br />particular area for water resources, not only from the <br /> <br />standpoint of farms, but M & I interests and all of the <br /> <br />other water interests, as well as the power interest, I think <br /> <br />ft.! llUJ III I'HU[NIX <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.