My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09291
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:52:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:34:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.200.05.P
Description
Hoover Dam/Lake Mead/Boulder Canyon Project
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/3/1979
Author
USACOE
Title
Transcript of a Public Hearing for Re-evaluation of A Flood Control Operation Plan for Hoover Dam: Yuma AZ
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />------- --r -- <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />No <br />. <br />0: <br />C'~ <br /> <br />:r-----'------ <br />ii S3 <br />, <br /> <br />with very logical thinking on the part of those that have <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />been involved in this. I'm not necessarily condemning <br /> <br />development altogether, but on the other hand, when one <br /> <br />moves into -- in a riverbed or into a bank inside of a <br /> <br />flood control dike, it seems as though, to me at least, that <br /> <br />" <br />" I <br /> <br />he's taking on a certain liability on his own behalf and a <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />certain responsibility for his actions and it doesn't seem <br /> <br />logical that the public at large should be held responsible <br /> <br />or a facility that is designed for the public at large <br /> <br />should begin to be limited for the benefit of those that <br /> <br />have not used very good judgment. Now I may be criticized <br /> <br /> ] , <br />, n <br /> - 'I <br /> , 1 <br /> ,. <br /> ) <br /> 1, <br /> , , <br /> <br />for saying what I'm saying, but these are somewhat my <br /> <br />sentiments. And I don't wish to belabor the point, but <br /> <br />really what I'm saying is that a person that is willing to <br /> <br />assume this type of a risk ought to be held accountable <br /> <br />for his assumptions. <br /> <br />I also think -- I have some problems trying to <br /> <br />rationalize the legality of this movement in the first <br /> <br /> <br />I' 1: place. And perhaps someone at the desk up there could <br />" <br />I <br />I, <br />"':: answer that question. What constitutes the legal limits of <br /> <br />,'! the banks of the River as far as public waters are concerned? <br /> <br />Does anyone have that answer? I realize that there are <br /> <br />'2:; probably no lawyers here, but it was always my assumption <br /> <br />~i that the high and low water limits sort of are a parameter <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />'j." <br /> <br />whereby we determine the banks of a river and if a high water <br /> <br />poll I! (InJ PHOfNIX <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.