My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09274
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09274
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:52:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:33:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110.60
Description
Colorado River Water Users Association
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/1/1947
Author
CRWUA
Title
Proceedings of the 1947 Conference
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. <br /> <br />MR" GIRLING: We just ca,me as representatives of a <br />small consen"ation district in Weste"ll Colorado. Although we produce a <br />large amount of this water- -we don't get any water,. -" like I say, really <br />we are not justified in taking up Colorado's position just now, as we just <br />represent a pretty small minority. I notice in our State's report it objects <br />to everything that is put in here. <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />It looks like Colorado produces 65% of the water. We have the <br />same trouble in the Upper Basin States. They want to divide it for us, <br />and the Lower Basin wants to divide the rest for us, and we will wake up <br />without any water. I don't know that I have very much more that I can <br />say because! am new on this. The man we had on the Conservation <br />Board died about two weeks ago, and I am not too well up on these points. <br />Mr. Smith was here last fall. <br /> <br />MR.MATTHEW: <br /> <br />We are sorry to hear that. <br /> <br />MR.GIRLlNG: That upset our plans a little bit. In <br />Colorado we have a kind of representation from Grand Junction, just two <br />of them over there. In the Grand Valley, where Mr. Smith was from, they <br />have all the water they need. They don't take too much interest in this. <br />The Wester Projects are small projects with no large amount of water. <br />For that reason, we don't seem to have an outstanding chance when it, <br />gets to putting these things over for us. <br /> <br />MR. MATTHEW: Would you care to discuss these prcjects <br />that are in the (';olorado comments for early authorization? <br /> <br />MR. GIRLING: I don't know much about them except <br />there are about 10,000 acre feet, which really doesn't make much difference <br />in the Colorado River. The big projects are across the hill. I think practically <br />all those on the West slope are small projects. There's no big smooth area; <br />it's mostly valleys. On the eastern slope you g!"t big plains where you get <br />an acreage. <br /> <br />MR. MATTHEW: <br /> <br />Are these IZ projects mostly on the west <br /> <br />slope? <br /> <br />MR. GIRLING: In Little valleys I think most of them are <br />on the western slope" Some go down into New Mexico. <br /> <br />r.HAIRMAN: I would like to ask Mr. Girling if up there <br />there wasn't a compact treaty between New Mexico and Colorado wherein <br />New Mexico is drawing considerable amounts of water from the Colorado <br />water sheds. <br /> <br />MR. GIRLIN01 That's right. especially the Rio Grande. <br />They had quite a lot of controversy last yea".. <br /> <br />.-2d!.~ <br /> <br />,,', <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.