My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09122
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP09122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 8:52:11 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:28:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.100
Description
Section D General Studies-Power
Date
1/1/1981
Author
DOI
Title
Dunham Point-Peaking Power Unit-Plan of Study-Colorado River Storage Project Power Peaking Capacity
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />T~e four account evaluation svstem is a ~et~od specified hv Principles <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />an~ Standards for evaluating alternatives in t~e selection of a prefp.rred <br /> <br />p1.an. <br /> <br />.T~e system 1S a tool u~ed to p.valuate the extent to w~ich plans <br /> <br />contribute ~it~er in a benefici.al or a~verse way. Benefits and costs a~e <br /> <br />evaluated eit~er in monetary or non-monetarv tp.rms <br /> <br />1.n each of t~p. four <br /> <br />accounts as ;nc';_caten below wt,icl, make it possi.ble to compare tr-at1e-offs <br /> <br />among alternatives. <br /> <br />1. Nati.onal economic cfeve1(loment (WD) account - Tn mOTletary tp'rms. <br /> <br />2. Envi.ronmp.ntal qll;::!l i.tv (EO' account - 1.n non-monp.tarv terms. <br /> <br />3. Regi.r:ma1. economic nevelopment. (RED) ~ccount - Tn r,otl) monetarv <br /> <br />and non~onetary te~ms. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Ot"er <br /> <br />Social <br /> <br />Effect. <br /> <br />(OSE) <br /> <br />account <br /> <br />r" <br /> <br />D'r~noT11.in<tntlv <br /> <br />non-monetarv term~. <br /> <br />!r t~e puhlic involvement program revea18 t;ere is DU~lic conflict ~e- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />t\"'?een t'\o'O or more plans. or if no plan ;s clearly fa"o'rerl ov~"(' ot~~r via- <br /> <br />ble plans. two or more plans mav neeti to he exam;.np.d A.t t,e feasinili.tv <br /> <br />level. <br /> <br />If t"i. <br /> <br />lS the case. only t~ose elements of alternative plans <br /> <br />toThicJ, are critical to t~e decisioTl ~t,o\11n he investjgateci at t"e Feasil-,i- <br /> <br />lity level. Following this, anot~er four account evaluation will neerl to <br /> <br />~e conducted on t~ose p'.ans to select the preferred plan(s). <br /> <br />The final nec1.sion on a preferred plan will he made as rlescr;~~(I i11, <br /> <br />~aoter IV. At t~e conclusion of t~e plan selection p;ase a plannin~ <br /> <br />confe~ence will ~e t,eld to r~v,~~ t~e n'an Formulation and s~l~ction <br /> <br />process. <br /> <br />T~is oJanning conference ~ill involve E~R Cp.nter. <br /> <br />R.eg;.onal <br /> <br />Office, ann field offi.ce personnel. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />j: <br />,... <br /> <br />0,81 ' <br /> <br />2\ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.