Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br /><0 <br /> <br />..-:') <br />~."'" <br />~ <br />N <br />o <br /> <br />20.. <br /> <br /> <br />pl s fuel oil equivalent to 615 kw-hrs. per ba~rel of fuel <br />ci. for present efficiency, and 665 kw-hrs. per barrel of <br />fue oil for estimated steam plant efficiencies in the <br />nea future. rhis presont efficiency is equivalent to that <br />obt ine<'1 at present by the Port 7/ashington Steam Plant, <br />nee. l.I1l\1Taukoe, Wisconsin, and the futu~e efficiency is <br />equ valent to that obtained in several mercury vapor pl$~ts <br />alr ad.y installed and expeoted to be obtained by a 2400- <br />pou d steam plant no"! under construct:j.on. <br />rhe fixed charges fOl' public 0,7nership and private <br />o"'ne ship as stated previously, covering interest and <br />arnor ization (or rate of return), operation, maintenance, <br />depr ciation, taxes, etc., "'ore applied to the investment <br />cost to obtain the total annual charges exclusive of fuel <br />and aIling '.'ater. ro these annual charges '!lere added the <br />cost of fuel for various prices of fuel oil to obtain the <br />tota cost of generatinc; and transmitting IloulderDam <br />eneI' to Los Angeles at 72.5';;; annual load factor, "1th <br />steam pea~ for delivering the energy to the system at 55% <br />aunue. load facter. <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />,~ <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />::: then calculated the cost of generating the total <br /> <br /> <br />of l, 52,000,000 ~t"'-hnj. at 55;b load factor in a substi- <br /> <br /> <br />tute team plant located at Los Angelea, rhis steam plantl <br /> <br /> <br />in or nr to delivor o.n annual peak of 343,000 k'.'f., '."ould <br /> <br /> <br />have reserve capacity of at. least 20%, malting the total <br /> <br />:1 <br />c;j <br />, <br />! <br />\] <br />l, <br />1 <br /> <br />A. 3. Roberts <br /> <br />, <br />