Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. 0 <br />r':'.) <br />,~ <br /> ~ <br /> N <br /> ~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />19. <br /> <br />to ,523,000,000 kw-hrs. delivered at Los Angeles. The <br />s!'.f delivered CQPQcity of the two cirouits is 240,000 kw. <br />AsJ,eViOUSlY mentioned under the heQding "Hydro versus <br />Ste~ PlQntslI, this 240,000 kw. should be 70% of the systom <br />peakl the remaining 30% to oe carried by steam plant, from <br />w1ic it is determined that the system peak should be <br /> <br />343, 00 kw. and the steam peak l03,000 kw. for lowest de- <br /> <br />live cd cost of energy to the system. 343,000 kw. peak at <br /> <br />n lO,d factor of 55% would require l,652,000,000 kw-hrs. <br /> <br />per e,".r, of which 1,523,000,000 kw-hrs. r'-re obt.o.incd from <br />Bould r Dam, l,)aving 129,000,000 kw-hrs. to be generated <br />by st run pl.'1.nt. <br /> <br />This transmission system would require, as reserve, <br /> <br />steam plant cr~neity equivQlent to one trQnsmission oircuit, <br /> <br />or l2 ,000 kw. In addition, thero would bo required l03,000 <br /> <br />kw. 0 steam pe~{ing plus 20% reserve, making .'1. tetal of <br /> <br /> <br />244,0 kw. of steam plant, manufacturer's rated capacity. <br /> <br />costs s sot ferth hereinbefore, the investment costs were <br /> <br />With this system as a b.'1.sis, and applying the unit <br /> <br />ebtain d for each of tho following separately: Generating <br /> <br /> <br />machin ry at Boulder, Boulder Transmission Lino including <br /> <br /> <br />switoh ng and receiving stations, and stoQm plant. <br /> <br />stoam ~lant was based <br />fuel Oi~ per year per <br />I <br />j <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />J <br /> <br />The barrels of fuel oil oonsumed per year in the <br /> <br />upon the formulQ 0.4 of a barrel of <br /> <br />kilowatt of steam plant oapacity, <br /> <br />A. B. Roberts <br /> <br />, <br />~ <br />'. <br />