Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />N <br />~ <br />co <br />"f <br /> <br />140 <br /> <br />8 <br />ii <br />~^ <br />s3~ <br />~~ <br />~~ <br />~g <br />~~ <br /> <br />.120 <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />80 <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />'40 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />,-' <br /> <br /> <br />N aftz and Spangler <br /> <br />... _... NON-OIL-FIELD BRINE MIX LINE <br />-OIL-FIELD BRINE MIX LINE <br />-.__.- INJECTION W A lliR MIX LINE <br />Do WA1ERSAMPLESFROMNAVAJO <br />AQUIFER WI1H CL > 60 MG/KG <br /> <br />.//.-.- \ <br /> <br />// BRlCL RATIO PREDICTED AFIER <br />Do / MIXING WITH ONE PERCENT OF <br />/ <br />/ OFB END-MEMBER WAlliR <br />/ . <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br /> <br />., <br />~ <br />'~f <br /> <br />............4 ~ Do <br />.........~Do <br />Do~~..~.... <br /> <br />o <br />10 <br /> <br />100 1,000 10,000 100,000 <br /> <br />CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION, IN <br />MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM <br /> <br />constructed with the m,'ean non-OFB end-member <br />water composition (Figu~e 6). If the salinity source <br />was OFB or injection water, bromide-to-chloride <br />ratios in water from the iN avajo aquifer wells should <br />follow the upper mixing lines as the chloride concen- <br />tration increases (Figu!,\e 6). This is not the trend <br />shown and indicates OFB!is not the source of salinity. <br />Because of the large difference in bromide concen- <br />trations between the upg-qadient Navajo aquifer water <br />and the OFB and injection water (Table 1), only a <br />small volume of OFB is .required to produce a very <br />large increase in the brorrlide-to-chloride weight ratio. <br />For example, a mixture of one percent OFB with 99 <br />percent Navajo aquifer :end-member water would <br />increase the bromide-to"chloride weight ratio from <br />less than 40 to larger tha~ 90 in the resulting mixture <br />(Figure 6). The sensitivity of the bromide-to-chloride <br />ratio in the Navajo aquifer to small volumes of OFB <br />or injection water provid~s additional evidence that <br />even small volumes of OF/3 or injection water salinity <br />sources probably are not/responsible for the salinity <br />increases in the Navajo 'aquifer. Furthermore, the <br />sensitivity of the bromideLto-chloride ratio in Navajo <br />aquifer waters to OFB ar.d injection-water salinity <br /> <br />Figure 6. ~xing Lines Constructed Between ,Mean Concentrations of Potential End-~embe~ Water <br />Comp~red to Bromide.to.Chloride Weight Ratios of Water Samples from the NavajO AquIfer. <br /> <br />WATER RESOURCES BUGLETIN <br /> <br />sources provides a useful tool for future monitoring in <br />the study area. . <br /> <br />Iodide.To-Chloride Ratios <br /> <br />Similar to bromide, iodide can be enriched in <br />organic material, providing a useful geochemical tool <br />to differentiate between OFB and non-OFB salinity <br />sources (Richter and Kreitler, 1991). Iodide is also l"el- <br />atively conservative in ground-water systems;howev- <br />er, it can be affected by sorption with iron and <br />aluminum (Maida, 1989). <br />Because of the lack of iodide analyses for non-OFB, . <br />iodide data are not sufficient to construct end-member <br />mixing models; however, a plot of the iodide-to-chlo- <br />ride weight ratios compared with increasing chloride <br />concentrations also indicates that OFB is riot the <br />source of salinity in the Navajo aquifer (Figure 7). <br />The five OFB samples in the study area have <br />enriched iodide-to-chloride weight ratios that are sig- <br />nifican tly larger than the ratios reported for' halite <br />solution brines (Richter and Kreitler, 1991) (Figure 7). <br /> <br /> <br />1128 <br /> <br />-~ <br />';~ <br />., <br />., <br /> <br />d. <br />