My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08835
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08835
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:17:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.100
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - NRCS-Ft Lyon Canal Co Limestone Graveyard Creeks
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
6/2/1993
Author
Gronning Engineering
Title
Ft Lyon Canal Company Water Transfer Alternatives Study Phase I Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> ,. <br />I DJlJ}Sa'.ih run a shareholder receives a release of approximately 0.015 cfs per share into <br />for 48 hours. This is also known as a 150% delivery. When there is reduced flow in the <br />I ditch riders extend the delivery time to allow the full allotment to be released. The delivery <br />the reduced flaw is as follows (Fort Lyon Canal Company 1983): <br /> 150% no extra at 48 hours <br />I 125% 10 minutes per hour (8 hours over on 48 hours) <br />100% 20 minutes per hour (16 hours over on 48 hours) <br /> 75% :30 minutes per hour (48 hours over on 48 hours) <br />I When the Ft. Lyon Canal is restricted to its most senior direct flow water of 165 cfs, i <br /> approximately one month to complete a run. When the canal is running its full 933 cfs, sha <br />I usually receive water two days out of every four. (Tipton and Kalmbach 1987) <br />The operations of the canal company are financed through assessments of the shareholders. <br />I 1992 assessments were $11.75/share and the 1991-92 operating budget for the com <br />$1,136,630. Included within the budget were assessments of $1.00/share for water purc <br />$1.00/share for special projects. The 1991-92 assessment description and operating fund <br />I included as Table A3.2 of Appendix 3. <br />Historical Diversions and Water SUDDlv <br />I Boyle Engineering with the assistance of Duane Helton compiled the historical diversions a <br />supply yield for the Ft. Lyon Canal Company as a part of the Kansas vs. Colorado litigatio <br /> summaries which were developed for the Arkansas Basin utilized four stream reaches. The <br />I Canal and its itrigated land lie within Reach 3 (Pueblo Dam to John Martin Dam) and Reac <br />Martin Dam to the Colorado-Kansas stateline) of the Boyle study area. The data is summ <br /> the entire Ft. Lyon system. As described previously Ft. Lyon Canal Company receives water <br />I Arkansas River, Horse Creek Reservoir, Adobe Creek Reservoir and Queen Reservoir. Th <br />annual yield of these diversions for the years 1950-1985 from the Boyle study are presented <br />3.5. <br />I Table 3.5 <br /> Fort Lyon Canal Company Historical Diversions <br />I Average Annual Diversions <br /> Acre-Feet <br />I Source 1950-1985 <br />Arkansas River direct flow rights 190,991 <br />I Horse Creek Reservoir I) 7,573 <br /> Adobe Creek Reservoir I) 11,443 <br />I Queen Reservoir I} 1,590 <br />I TOTAL ALL SOURCES 211,597 <br />1) Delivery to Fort Lyon Canal <br /> 3-7 <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />his lateral <br />canal, the <br />times for <br /> <br />t requires <br />reholders <br /> <br />The 1991- <br />pany was <br />hase and <br />budget is <br /> <br />nd water <br />n. Their <br />Ft. Lyon <br />h 4 (John <br />arized for <br />from the <br />e average <br />in Table <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.