My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08835
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08835
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:17:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.100
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - NRCS-Ft Lyon Canal Co Limestone Graveyard Creeks
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
6/2/1993
Author
Gronning Engineering
Title
Ft Lyon Canal Company Water Transfer Alternatives Study Phase I Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3-8 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />0088 <br /> <br />Monthly tabulations of t\.1e water supply for the Ft. Lyon Company system from the Arkans~s River, <br />Horse Creek Reservoir, Adobe Creek Reservoir, and Qu~en Reservoir are presented in Table A3.3 of <br />Appendix 3. Fryingpan-Arkansas project water allocatio/l as well as any minor sources of supply such <br />as annual leases are included in the direct flow water right tabulation. An annual summary of water <br />supplies available by source is shown in Table 3.6. The average system yield in Table 3.4 is 211,597 <br />acre-feet and the total surface supply ranges from 94,145 to 383,056 acre feet annually over the 1950 <br />to 1985 period. <br /> <br />For the purpose of determining yield, data in the surface column of Table 3.6 is analyzed in an <br />emperical distribution with 36 data points. The result is presented in Figure 3.2. The probability, also <br />termed reliability, of divertable yield is determined. F~r example, the ninety percent (P = 1.0 - .90 <br />= 0.1) reliable annual flow is about 110,000 afper year! i.e., a minimum flow of 110,000 af annually <br />should be available 90 percent of the time. <br /> <br />Groundwater Suooly <br /> <br />Groundwater is used as a supplemental source of water supply by individual shareholders under the <br />Ft. Lyon Canal. Total monthly pumping under the Ft. Lyon Canal within Reach 3 and Reach 4 has <br />been summarized and is included in Table A3.4 of AppJndix 3. Ground water pumping presented in <br />Table 3.6 averaged 26,347 acre-feet annually and adds ~2% to the total water supply of the system. <br /> <br />At the present time ground water pumping is extensively regulated by the State Engineer's Office. <br />Rules and regulations promulgated by the State Engineer's Office require full augmentation of all wells <br />installed subsequent to July 1, 1972. For wells installed prior to this date pumping is allowed only 3 <br />of every 7 days provided other appropriators are not adversely affected. Temporary substitute supply <br />plans are utilized to allow the wells constructed prior:to July 1, 1972 to pump on additional days. <br />(Order of the State Engineer 1972) The Colorado Water Protective and Development Association is <br />the temporary plan for the reach of the Arkansas Riiver from Pueblo Reservoir to John Martin <br />Reservoir. The Lower Arkansas Water Management ASsociation is the temporary plan for the reach <br />of the river from John Martin Reservoir to the Colorado/Kansas state line. (Witte 1993) <br /> <br />Historical Consumotive Use and Return Flows <br /> <br />A calculation of the average water consumption and return flows for the Ft. Lyon Canal Company <br />system was developed by Duane D. Helton of Helton 8/ Williamsen, PC and is included as Table A3.5 <br />of Appendix 3. These calculations were based on data jand analyses which were prepared as a result <br />of the Kansas vs. Colorado litigation. The Helton analysis was prepared for the compact years 1950 <br />through 1985. The crop consumptive use and soil eva~oration for water from Queen Reservoir were <br />calculated using the same efficiency as the direct flow 'diversions. (Helton 1993). The average crop <br />water consumption for the study period for the Ft. Lyon Canal Company system is summarized below. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.