Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1972-82 <br />63,871 <br /> <br />1983-87 <br />o <br /> <br />1988 <br />28,000 <br /> <br />!1989 <br /> <br />45,600 <br /> <br />1990 <br />15,040 <br /> <br />1991 <br />22,560 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />OG8G <br /> <br />Table 3.4 <br /> <br />Fort Lyon Canal Company <br />Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Allocations <br />(acre-feet) . <br /> <br />Source: Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy [listrict, 1991 Annual Report <br /> <br />Operations <br /> <br />As a mutual irrigation company, water is delivered in proportion to share ownership into 365 <br />stockholder headgates distributed along the length of the canal. The canal company is divided into <br />five divisions and delivers water on a rotational basis. iThe five divisions of the company are shown <br />on Figure 3.1 and include the La Junta Division, whichi begins at the headgate and extends to Gate <br />21D; the Horse Creek Division, which extends to Gate 77; the Las Animas Division, which extends to <br />Gate 149; the Limestone Division, which extends through Gate 202D; and the Lamar Division, which <br />extends through Gate 259. (Rules and Regulations, December 1983) <br /> <br />The present ownership of Ft. Lyon shares and delivery of water by division and also by county is <br />shown below (Smith 1993): <br /> <br />Canal Division <br />La Junta Division <br />Horse Creek Division <br />Las Animas Division <br /> <br />Principal County <br />Otero County <br /> <br />Share Ownership and Deliverv <br />PercentaS!e <br /> <br />Lamar Division <br /> <br />Prowers County <br /> <br />2% <br />14% <br />23% <br />28% <br />33% <br /> <br />Limestone Division <br /> <br />Bent County <br /> i <br />Bent County I <br />, <br />, <br />Bent County i <br /> <br />Of the 365 stockholder headgates, there are approximately 18 major headgates which serve multiple <br />users, some of which have been organized as lateral colnpanies. There is no distinction made by the <br />Ft. Lyon Canal Company in its prorated delivery of water to either individual stockholder headgates <br />or to lateral headgates. The company has no resp011sibility for shareholder delivery beyond the <br />channel of the Ft. Lyon canal. ' <br /> <br />The canal company's standard practice is that deliveries of water to shareholders begin in the upstream <br />division of the canal. When delivery has been made to all laterals in a division, delivery is then shifted <br />to the next lower division. Once water has been delivElred to all divisions a run has been completed. <br /> <br />3.6 <br />