My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08584
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08584
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:48:49 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:05:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8543.400
Description
Projects in the Closed Basin Division - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
8/15/1967
Title
Evaluation Report On Closed Basin Division - San Luis Project - Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-6- <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado to help meet Colorado's Rio Grande Compact ob- <br /> <br />ligations to the States of New Mexico and Texas and a <br /> <br />substantial segment of the annual salvage would be used <br /> <br />to payoff an alleged Colorado debit of about a million <br /> <br />acre-feet under the Compact. <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation reports that sufficient water <br /> <br />can be salvaged in the "Closed Basin" to meet the annual <br /> <br />Compact requirements, payoff the accumulated debit in 35 <br /> <br />years, and subsequently have a substantial volume of water <br /> <br />available annually for new uses in Colorado. Possible new <br /> <br />uses, according to the U.S.B.R., could be: (1) irrigation <br /> <br />of new lands, (2) supplemental water for lands now being <br />inadequately irrigated, and/or (3) the enhancement of wild- <br />life and recreational facilities.* <br /> <br />The U. S. Bureau of Reclamation project plan proposes <br /> <br />that all costs with the exception of some lands and rights- <br /> <br />of-way and some basic recreational facilities, be paid by <br /> <br />the Federal Government. Although the Bureau admits that <br /> <br />this is a departure from usual Reclamation practice, it is <br /> <br />considered to be justified because of (1) the difficulty of <br /> <br />identifying the benefi ciaries, (2) interstate river compact <br />requirements, and (3) United States Treaty obligations with <br /> <br />Mexico. <br /> <br /> <br />* <br />See comments under Administrative and Legal Requirements, <br />Page 21 <br /> <br />f1; ;.300 <br />\..~ l.,; \.. 1] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.