My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08564
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08564
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 9:55:03 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:04:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8147
Description
Gunnison-Arkansas Project
State
CO
Water Division
4
Date
2/27/1951
Author
CWCB
Title
Report of Policy and Review Committee with Proposed Principles of Operation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />11.63: <br /> <br />resulting from diversions from those streams be prevented by including <br /> <br />0- <br /> <br />as part of the project "orks of the initial phase an extension of the <br /> <br />Hunter Creek Conduit to the Sout:l Forks of Hunter Creek and tile <br /> <br />enlargement of the tunnel from Chapman Gulch to the east end of thp <br /> <br />Frying Pan-Arkansas Tunnel at an estimated total cost of ~2,179,OOO, <br /> <br />with the understanding that these costs will be shown in the report as <br /> <br />allocated to fish and wildlife purposes. This is based on the theory that <br /> <br />the additional wlter to be collected vlill be available for exchange to the <br /> <br />,Tvlin Lakes Reservoir Rnd Canal Co~p~~y upon execution of appropriate <br /> <br />agreements whereby that. company will refrnin from diverting waters fr:>m <br /> <br /> <br />the Roaring Fork River an,,; its tributilries to which it is legally entitled <br /> <br /> <br />(wi thout aba"donin; "'w 01 Us right.s thereto) whenever the natural inflow <br /> <br />of the Roaring Fork awi its tributaries nay be only sufficient to maintain <br /> <br />a flow ,equal to, or less than, that recommended as a minimum at Aspen <br /> <br />according, to the schedule submitted by the Fish and ;lildlife Service and <br /> <br />the Colorado Game and Fish Commission.' <br /> <br />Return Flow of Inlport.ed V{ater <br /> <br />_ _ _ _ _ _ _It_.iLrecognized_by _t.he_C,ommi ttee__that_due_to_use_and_~euse_oL_. <br /> <br />return flow the project benefits will be more t.han the first application <br /> <br />of project water. The Engineering Advisory Subcommittee has estimated the , <br /> <br />water supplies attributR-ble to the project, and it is recommended that the <br /> <br />table included in the Engineering Report of December 30, 19)"", copy of <br /> <br />which is attached hereto, be used as a measure of project irrigation <br /> <br />benefits for the Initial Phase, Gunnison-Arkansas Project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.