Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />Table ES-I, Summary of Potential Impacts of the Execution of the lA, Adoption of the lOP, and Implementation of Biological <br /> <br />?: <br />o <br />:;l <br />" <br />~ <br />... <br />;>0 <br />" <br />;;- <br />..- <br />... <br />~ <br />... <br />" <br />, <br />!:. <br />;.. <br />" <br />- <br />o. <br />:1 <br />.. <br />"" <br />.... <br />'" <br /> <br /> Conservation Measures (Page 2 of 29) <br />REsource/Issue No Action Impacts of Proposed Action/Alternatives <br /> HYDROLOGy/WATER QUALlTY/W A TER SUPPLY <br />Potential impacts to water aualitv from transfers Under No Action, salinity concentralions below Under the lA, projected salinity is similar to that of <br />authorized by the IA. Hoover, Parker, and Imperial Dams are projected to No Action. Below Hoover Dam and Parker Dam, <br /> reach objectives by the year 2006. proJected salinity under the IA is no more than 1 <br /> Salinity control projects will ensure these objective mg/L higher than would be expected under No <br /> Action. At Imperial Dam, salinity is no more than 8 <br /> levels are not exceeded. mg/L higher than would occur under No Aclion. <br /> However, these impacts will be fully mitigated by <br /> implementation of authorized salinity control <br /> projects, which will ensure that objective levels are <br /> not exceeded. <br />POlential impacls to groundwater from transfers In the valleys below Parker, it is estimated that for The decline in median river stage could result in ~D <br />authorized by the IA. every 1 unit in drop in river elevation, groundwater similar declines in median grou-ndw<tter levels (as <br /> under irrigated fields will drop by half a unit. In a much as 4.4 inches)"relativeto the No-Action <br /> non-irrigated reach, groundwater elevation drop is Alte~native. Reduction in groundwater elevation <br /> assumed to be equal to the river drop. would be greatest in non. irrigated areas and less <br /> severe in irrigated areas. <br />Implementation Agreement/Inadvertent Overrun Policy <br />Potential impacts to Colorado River lIood None. Proposed lOP: Under the worst case scenario, <br />releases from inadvertent overruns and payback excess..1lows to Mexico could be reduced by <br />policy. approximately~. On average, excess flows to <br /> Mexico could be reduced by approximately 24 KAF. <br /> For both the maximum and average overrun account <br /> balances, probability of a flood release was <br /> decreased by 1 to 3.5 percent in some of the years <br /> modeled. <br /> No Forgiveness Alternative: Same as the proposed >< <br /> project. " <br /> " <br /> ~ <br /> - <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />o <br />"" <br />.... <br />'" <br />I <br />- <br />" <br />~ <br />~ <br />" <br />'-'! <br />'" <br />'" <br />'" <br />'" <br /> <br />~ <br />:,.I(~ <br />~ <br /> <br />"" <br /> <br />tT1 <br />'{' <br />.... <br />.... <br /> <br />~ <br />". <br />" <br />~ <br />3 <br />:I <br />" <br />'-'! <br />