Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />rn <br />'{' <br />- <br />o <br /> <br />Table ES-l, Summary of Potential Impacts of the Execution of the lA, Adoption of the lOP, and Implementation of Biological <br />Conservation Measures (Page 1 of 29) <br /> <br />'" <br />.. <br />" <br />~ <br />~ <br />~. <br />" <br />~ <br />~ <br />3 <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />N <br />'" <br />'" <br />N <br /> <br />I Rt:source/lssue No Actioa Impacts of Proposed ActioajA/fematives <br /> HYDROlOGY!W A TER QUAlITY/W A TER SUPPlY <br /> Implementation Agreement <br /> Potential impacts to Colorado River flows from Projected A verage Annual Flow (MAFY): Primary impacts are in the reach between Parker <br /> transfers authorized by the IA. Glen Canyon to Hoover Dam: B.23 to 10 Dam and Imperial Dam. Below Parker Dam, due 10 <br /> Hoover Dam to Parker Dam: 8.54 to 9.72 transfers authorized by the lA, average annual flows <br /> Parker Dam to Imperial Dam: would decrease from 138 KAF to 388 KAF. This <br /> At Headgate Rock Dam: 6.72 to 6.8 could result in lowering of median annual surface <br /> Below Palo Verde Diversion Dam: 6.02 to 6.16 water levels by LIP to 4.4 inches in this reach. <br /> Potential impacts to reservoir levels from Lake Powell levels are expected to be lower than Lake Powell and Lake Mead water surface <br /> transfers authorized by the IA. historic levels due to increased Upper Basin devations would decline under No Action and this <br /> depletions. Median Lake Powell levels are trend would continue with implementation of the <br /> expected to decline for a number of years and then IA. The IA would not cause a significant change <br /> slabilize. In Ihe shorllerm (years 2002-2010), Lake relative to No Action in the anticipated lake levels. <br /> Mead levels would be greater than that needed to <br /> ptoduce electricily. However, after year 2011. there <br /> would be '" 44% probability that Lake Mead would <br /> fall below 1083 feet ms!. Through 2017, modeling <br /> results show that Lake Mead levels would exceed <br /> that needed for operation of SNW A's original <br /> intake (1050 feet msl), after 2017, reservoir levels <br /> would decline and there would be a 40% <br /> probability that Lake Mead would be lower than <br /> 1050 feet mean sea level (msl). During years 2002 <br /> through 2049, modeling shows that Lake Mead <br /> . levels would be greater than n(..~essary to operate <br /> Southern Nevada Water Authority's (SNW A) <br /> second waler intake (1000 feet msl). But after 2049 <br /> there would be a 6% probability thaI Lake Mead <br /> elevation would be below elevation 1000 feet msl. <br /> <br />/ <br />t.!P . <br /> <br />C,. v <br /> <br />o <br />'" <br />- <br /><r> <br />I <br />- <br />" <br />~ <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />?= <br />i3 <br />:c <br />" <br />" <br />"- <br />~ <br />" <br />D <br />- <br />" <br />"- <br />." <br />" <br />"- <br />" <br />~ <br />" <br /> <br />:.. <br />" <br />:to <br />o <br />" <br />'" <br />'" <br />- <br /><r> <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />:- <br /> <br />J_ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />:-.- <br />