Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />tT1 <br />'f' <br />~ <br />IV <br /> <br />Table ES-l, Summary of Potential Impacts of the Execution of the lA, Adoption of the lOP, and Implementation of Biological <br />Conservation Measures (Poge 3 of 29) <br /> <br />'" <br />~ <br />" <br />g <br />- <br />;:;. <br />" <br />~ <br />3 <br />" <br />" <br /><< <br /> <br />tl <br />'" <br />..... <br />'J> <br />I <br /> <br />ResoLlrce/lsslle No Acti011 Impacts of Proposed Actiol//Altematives <br /> HYDROLOGYIW A TER QUAlITYIW A TER SUrPL Y <br />Potential impacts lu Colorado River flows from Without passage of the 101', the Secretary would be Proposed 101': With implementation of the 101', the <br />inadvertent overruns and payback policy. required to enforce the provisions of the Decree. average increase in annual flow during overruns in <br /> The Secretary would continue with the existing the Hoover-Io Parker River reach would be <br /> policy of not delivering water in excess of a State's, approximately 90 KAF. An increase of 90 KAF to <br /> water district's, or entity's entitlement. No impact annual flow represents an increase from historic <br /> on now. average annual flows of 0.8 percent and an increase <br /> over flows under No Action as great as 1.1 percentl. <br /> The average decrease in flow due to paybacks <br /> would be roughly 72 KAF, or 0.6 percenlless than <br /> average annual historic flows and 0.8 percent less <br /> than under No Action. Assuming the worst-cilse <br /> scenario, annual flows from Hpover Dam 10 Parker <br /> Dam could be augmenled by overruns by as much <br /> as 313 KAF and diminished by payback as great as <br /> 206 KAF. However, these represent the most <br /> extreme possible annual flow changes. <br /> With implementation of the lOP, the average <br /> increase in annual flow in the Parker to Imperial <br /> River reach would be approximalely 90 KAf. An <br /> increase of 90 KAf to annual flow represents an <br /> increase from historic average annual flows of 0.9 <br /> percent and an increase over flows under No Action <br /> ~s greal as 1.3 percent2. The average decrease in <br /> flow would be roughly 63 KAF, or 0.7 percent less <br /> than average annual historic flows and 0.9 percent <br /> less than under No Action. Assuming the worst- <br /> case scenario, annual flows below Parker Dam could <br /> be augmented by overruns by as much as 313 KAF <br /> and diminished by payback as gre.,t as 176 KAF. <br /> However, these represent the most extreme possible <br /> .mnual flow changes. <br /> <br />- <br />" <br />:! <br />~ <br /><< <br /> <br />N <br />'" <br />'" <br />N <br /> <br />..... <br />i"- <br /> <br />..... <br />o <br />,'1:1 <br />" <br />~ <br />... <br />~ <br />'" <br />;;- <br />~ <br />" <br />... <br />~ <br />... <br />'" <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />;.. <br />~ <br />- <br />o. <br />~ <br />~ <br />'" <br />..... <br /><J> <br /> <br />I <br />2 <br /> <br />Increased and dl'crl:'aseJ flows resulting from implementation of Ihe lOP were compared to estimated nows under No Action at f-Iavasu National NWR. <br />Increased and decreased flows resulting from implementation of the lOP were compared to estimated flows under No Action at I-Ieadgate Rock Dam. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />11II <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />lID <br />