My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08369
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08369
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:47:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:57:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.120.10
Description
Grand Valley Unit-Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/2/1983
Title
Agenda Item 14 March 3 1983 Board Meeting--Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'<l' <br />::;) <br />N <br />~ <br /> <br />'-. <br />.",-" <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin <br />Saliniiy Control r=orum <br />106 West 500 South. Suite 101 <br />Bountiful. Utah 84010 <br />(80l) 292.4663 <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />January 13, 1983 <br /> <br />Mr. Al Jonez, Director <br />Colorado River Water Quality Office <br />U.s. Bureau of Reclamation <br />P.O. Box 25007" Code D-IOOO <br />Denver, Colorado 80225 <br /> <br />Dear AI: <br /> <br />TIle Department of the Interior has taken the position that the salinity <br />legislation should be modified so that all of the units we 113ve requested be <br />authorized now will not be authorized until feasibility studies have been <br />completed. As you may recall, there are six units in the legislation. They <br />are: Stage I of Lower Cunnison, McElmo Creek; Stage I of Uinta Basin, Palo <br />Verde Irrigation District, the Saline Water Use and Disposal Opportunity <br />Unit. and the Sinbad Valley Unit. <br /> <br />I would appreciate an analysis from the Bureau of Reclamation indicating <br />the ilnpacts on the timing of the potential construction of these units by the <br />Department of the Interior's position as compared to the Forum's position <br />that they should now be authorized. I realize some of your analysis will be <br />subject to speculation because you would be forced to assume that authorization <br />could be successfully and promptly secured once a feasibility study was <br />completed. At this point in time I do not want to debate the merits of the <br />Forum's or the Department's position, but I would observe that there may.be <br />significant delays in securing authorization, given the mood of the Congress <br />in recent years, after feasibility has been accomplished. <br /> <br />In addition, as I indicated the other day in Denver, I would appreciate <br />your checking Assistant Secretary Carruther's position with respect to the <br />Bureau of Land Management and Bureau of Reclamation programs. He was going <br />to determine what type of program should remain with ~he Bureau of Land <br />}~nagement. Sinbad Valley was a case in point. He was also going to look ~t <br />funding procedures within Interior. <br /> <br />A brief timely analysis would be most helpful. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />~'.Jc . <br />ack A. Barnett <br />Executive Director <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.