My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
DWR_3312967
DWR
>
Reference Library
>
2018
>
09
>
DWR_3312967
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2018 11:37:05 AM
Creation date
9/14/2018 11:33:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reference Library
Title
WESTERN DAM ENGINEERING NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 6, ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2018
Author/Source
AECOM
Keywords
HEC-HMS VERSUS HEC-RAS, HUMAN FACTORS IN DAM INCIDENTS, LOW LEVEL OUTLET CONDUITS
Document Type - Reference Library
Research, Thesis, Technical Publications
Document Date
8/1/2018
Year
2018
Team/Office
Dam Safety
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />18 <br />Abandonment of Low-Level <br />Outlet Conduits…Think it <br />Through Before you Grout it <br />Through <br />By: Richard F. Walker Jr, PE <br />Introduction <br />Deterioration of low-level outlet conduits is a common <br />problem, especially for older embankment dams. <br />When the existing conduit deteriorates to a point <br />where it can no longer serve its intended design <br />purpose, a decision must be made to rehabilitate, <br />remove and replace, or abandon it. <br />Removal and replacement is the most reliable <br />approach, but will most likely require draining of the <br />reservoir and result in the highest cost to the owner. <br />Rehabilitation can be a reasonable alternative and is <br />typically accomplished by one of two methods, <br />sliplining or cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) liners; however, <br />it may not be applicable for severely deteriorated <br />conduits (See Figure 1) or changes in loading <br />conditions. <br />In some cases, the owner and/or designer may find it <br />technically and economically more feasible to install a <br />new alternate means of water conveyance and <br />abandon the conduit by grouting it closed and leaving <br />it in place. The advantages of abandoning an existing <br />conduit through an embankment dam include: <br />• Excavation—A large excavation is not required <br />through the embankment dam. <br />• Reservoir operation—Abandonment can in some <br />cases be done while the reservoir is full. <br />• Costs—Costs are generally less than other <br />rehabilitation and replacement methods. <br />The disadvantages of abandoning an existing conduit <br />through an embankment dam include: <br />• Grouting—Difficulties may be encountered while <br />trying to fill the existing conduit with grout. <br />• Loss of use—A replacement means of providing <br />downstream flow and flood discharge capacity will <br />be required. <br />The most common way to abandon an existing conduit <br />is by backfilling with grout or concrete. Owners of <br />dams with release requirements may choose to <br />abandon the existing conduit after installing a new one <br />in a new location. In embankment dams with small <br />reservoirs and no regulation or requirements on <br />regular water flow or release, an abandoned conduit’s <br />function can be accomplished by an alternative means <br />of water conveyance, such as a siphon or high-level <br />outlet conduit. <br />This article will focus on abandoning conduits without <br />replacement in-kind for small-sized dams. Information <br />is presented on alternatives for water conveyance, the <br />implications of abandoning a conduit in-place, and the <br />means and method of abandoning the conduit. <br />Figure 1. Severely deteriorated CMP outlet conduit. [4] <br /> <br />Figure 2. Typical drop-inlet structure for outlet conduit.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.