Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />14 <br />inspections to identify the initial cause before it recurs <br />or progresses undetected. <br /> <br /> <br />Emergency Response/Management <br />Human factors also play a large role in how an <br />emergency situation is managed from the initial <br />notification to completion of the final repair. It is <br />human nature to either “fight or flight.” As an owner, <br />owner’s engineer, or regulatory agency it is a <br />notification that we hope never comes, but, when it <br />does how will human factors influence the outcome? <br />Stress Management <br />Individuals placed in emergency response situations <br />are impacted by psychological stressors that can <br />impact their mental and physical health. These <br />stressors can ultimately have an effect on one’s ability <br />to make critical judgments and decisions during a <br />crisis. The first line in combating stress is preparation. <br />Training, planning, and reviewing available information <br />will better prepare you for an emergency. Preparation <br />is the best “cure” for anticipatory stress [2]. Most <br />important is to remain calm, take a deep breath, and <br />don’t be afraid to ask for help. <br />Communication Styles <br />During an emergency situation the effective sharing <br />and transmittal of information is critical. Emergency <br />Action Plans (EAPs) are available for most, if not all, <br />significant to high hazard dams and contain scripted <br />procedures for making notifications. However, what <br />the EAP doesn’t contain is a guide for the different <br />types of communicating styles that will be necessary to <br />use during an emergency situation. Communicating to <br />different groups of people requires different styles and <br />techniques to convey the appropriate information in <br />an appropriate manner. Therefore, different <br />individuals may be assigned to communicate to the <br />different groups. The various groups of people that will <br />be in the communication loop include: <br />• Media <br />• Public <br />• Emergency managers <br />• On-site owner representative(s) <br />• Owner decision makers <br />• Regulatory agencies <br />• Contractors <br />Initial conversations with the media or public may not <br />be best handled by the owner or engineer, as they are <br />under the duress of figuring out the problem and <br />deciding on a path forward. However, almost any <br />emergency management team has a designated Public <br />Information Officer (PIO) available. PIO's can be city, <br />county or state personnel who have been trained to <br />take technical verbiage from experts and convey it to <br />the public in a manner that can be understood. <br />Owners and engineers do not have an obligation to <br />speak to the public or media. They do, however, have <br />an obligation to get the appropriate information out to <br />the public. With a simple request for assistance from <br />the local emergency management team, the closest or <br />designated PIO could assist. Information provided to <br />the public should be concise, accurate, and delivered <br />in layman terms to limit the potential for misquotes or <br />fake news. <br />Emergency managers may not comprehend the <br />technical issues that are influencing the decision <br />making process, and therefore need information <br />conveyed in a manner which describes the likelihood <br />of various scenarios and the associated implications to <br />the public. Therefore, information provided to <br />emergency managers should be non-technical in <br />nature, but provide a clear picture of the developing <br />situation and potential consequences. FEMA maintains <br />a listing of state emergency management agencies: <br />Emergency Management Agencies. The local city or <br />county may also have emergency management <br />representatives and resources. <br />When briefing owners and regulatory agency <br />representatives, the information should be provided in <br />a technical manner to present a clear understanding of <br />the incident. <br /> Budget constraints <br /> Complacency and overconfidence <br /> Insufficient technical expertise <br /> Categorization of significant repairs as “routine maintenance” <br /> Access limitations <br />HUMAN FACTORS IN MAINTENANCE <br />