Laserfiche WebLink
Meridian Village WW Reuse Dam, (DAMID 080457) July 19, 2017 <br /> Jurisdictional Status Et Hazard Classification Page 3 of 9 <br /> Jurisdictional Status <br /> According to Rule 4.2.5, a jurisdictional dam must exceed one or more of the following <br /> criteria: <br /> x Reservoir storage capacity below the spillway crest elevation of 100 acre-feet, <br /> x Reservoir area at the spillway crest of 20 acres, or <br /> x Dam height of 10 feet in accordance with Rule 4.2.19. <br /> The low level outlet pipe extends through the left abutment and does not daylight near the <br /> dam; therefore it is excluded from the dam height evaluation. According to the CDG, the <br /> original ground elevation at the maximum section of the dam is 5,941.2 feet. Comparing this <br /> to the design spillway elevation of 5,948.0 feet yields a jurisdictional (hydraulic) height of 6.8 <br /> feet. <br /> As mentioned above, the reservoir area at the spillway crest elevation is approximately <br /> 15.7 acres, which is less than the minimum area criteria above. The total reservoir storage <br /> capacity below the spillway crest is 190 acre-feet, however 91 acre feet of this is excavation <br /> below the downstream toe of the embankment and is not included. Therefore, the storage <br /> capacity between the downstream toe and the spillway crest is 99 acre-feet. <br /> None of the jurisdictional dam criteria is exceeded, therefore Meridian Village WW Reuse <br /> Dam is a non-jurisdictional dam. <br /> Hazard Classification <br /> A dam breach analysis was performed using the 2D module in HEC-RAS 5.0. Topography for <br /> the analysis consisted of 0.75m resolution LiDAR gathered in Fall 2013. The elevations used <br /> for this analysis were based on the elevations found in the LiDAR topography and differ <br /> slightly from those provided by the engineer. <br /> Two breach locations were evaluated for this analysis. The first analysis evaluated a breach <br /> through the maximum embankment section, coincidentally occurring at the spillway location. <br /> This first analysis reflects the traditional approach to evaluate the hazard classification of a <br /> dam. However, the excavation for construction of both the ditch (downstream side of the <br /> dam) and the reservoir (upstream side of the dam) created a potential foundation seepage <br /> failure mode that could result in a slightly larger breach flood than would occur under the <br /> normal through-embankment sunny-day seepage failure. Therefore, a second analysis was <br /> performed to evaluate a potential foundation seepage failure into the drainage ditch <br /> immediately right of the spillway. <br /> Initial Breach Parameters <br /> The initial breach parameters were calculated using the Colorado Dam Safety empirical <br /> spreadsheets. According to the Guidelines for Dam Breach Analysis (SEO, 2010), the <br /> Montgomery Et Langridge-Monopolis with Washington State failure time (MLM-Wa) method was <br /> used for the first analysis (embankment seepage). Due to the larger reservoir volume <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 821, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.866.3581 www.water.state.co.us <br /> John W. Hickenlooper, Governor I Robert Randall, DNR Executive Director I Kevin Rein, Director/State Engineer *�� <br /> �`1876�` <br />