Laserfiche WebLink
20 <br />Photo 1: Aerial image of UEV and LEV Dams. <br />Based on post-failure survey data, the UEV Dam was <br />estimated to have a maximum height of 12 feet and <br />storage capacity of approximately 6.4 acre-feet. The <br />LEV Dam was a larger structure, with an estimated <br />maximum height of 14 feet and storage capacity of <br />approximately 11.4 acre-feet. <br />Post-failure inspections of the UEV Dam identified at <br />least eight pipelines penetrating through the <br />embankment and ranging in diameter from 8 to 30 <br />inches (see Photo 2). The pipe penetrations were the <br />only means for releasing inflows from the reservoir, <br />since the UEV Dam did not have an emergency <br />overflow spillway. Additionally, a septic tank was <br />observed embedded within the left abutment of the <br />embankment with pipelines extending parallel to the <br />dam crest to a leach field on the right abutment. It was <br />also observed that the dam crest elevation was not <br />uniform along the length of the dam and contained <br />several low areas. <br />Photo 2: UEV Dam post-failure looking upstream. <br />Similar to the UEV Dam, post-failure inspections of the <br />LEV Dam revealed the dam crest elevation was not <br />uniform along the length of the dam and contained <br />several low areas. Post-failure inspections also <br />indicated the dam was constructed on a timber <br />foundation to support the embankment over organic <br />foundation materials with a timber cutoff wall <br />constructed below the core of the dam. The principal <br />spillway for the LEV Dam was a 3-foot-diameter <br />corrugated metal pipe (CMP) drop inlet located near <br />the left abutment. It is unknown if a trashrack was <br />installed at the inlet to the pipe. An emergency <br />spillway also consisting of a 3-foot-diameter CMP was <br />found near the right abutment. The elevations of the <br />principal and emergency spillways are unknown, but it <br />is likely the emergency spillway was higher in elevation <br />than the principal spillway and would only be active in <br />large floods, such as the September 2013 storm. An 18- <br />inch diameter steel low-level outlet was observed near <br />the central portion of the dam, but it is unknown if the <br />outlet was operational or had a trashrack. <br />In 1997, the LEV Dam had reportedly failed. The <br />downstream slope in the area of the breach was <br />reconstructed with a relatively steep slope compared <br />to other areas of the downstream slope that were <br />fairly gentle. Aerial photos indicate the 2013 failure <br />occurred at the same location as the 1997 failure. The <br />LEV Dam repairs completed in 1997 may have <br />contributed to the 2013 failure of the dam, considering <br />the relatively steep reconstructed downstream slope in <br />the area of the failure. It is also likely the timber <br />foundation was also not repaired. Photo 3 below <br />shows the LEV Dam post-failure. <br />Photo 3: LEV Dam post-failure looking upstream. <br />According to an eyewitness account, the LEV Dam <br />overtopped and failed first, followed by overtopping <br />and failure of the UEV Dam. Hydrologic modeling <br />UEV Dam <br />LEV Dam