Laserfiche WebLink
Western Dam Engineering <br />Technical Note <br />17 <br />base his bid assumptions and (2) design his required <br />components. Generally, this is accomplished by including <br />available information in bid documents provided to the <br />contractor in what’s known as a baseline report. A <br />baseline report may include geotechnical data reports, <br />flood hydrology reports, annual streamflow records, <br />descriptions of on-site and off-site materials, and <br />identification of areas available for contractor use. <br />3.Information to be Verified by the Contractor <br />In some cases, the information needed for the <br />development of contractor designed components may <br />not be available prior to construction, and it may be left <br />to the contractor’s discretion to obtain the necessary <br />information. In these cases, it should be explicitly stated <br />within the specifications that it is the contractor’s <br />responsibility to verify conditions. This may require them <br />to perform additional investigations, such as subsurface <br />exploration or camera inspections of outlets. <br />4.Submittal Process and Review Times <br />When provisioning for contractor-designed items, <br />sufficient lead time must be allocated in the schedule for <br />any required investigations by the contractor, the design <br />development (including analyses, shop drawings, and <br />specifications), submittal review, and fabrication. All <br />contractor design submittals should be stamped by a <br />registered professional engineer, preferably registered in <br />the state where the project is being completed. Review <br />and approval of these design components may also <br />involve third parties, such as regulatory agencies, which <br />will take additional time. The engineer’s review and <br />approval of these components generally constitutes <br />acceptance of the contractor’s plan but does not relieve <br />the contractor, or his designer, of the professional <br />responsibility for their effectiveness. <br />Examples of Where Team Effort <br />Specifications Might Be Used Effectively <br />These are some typical components in which the result or <br />performance requirement of the component is known, <br />but there is generally some flexibility regarding the <br />means and methods that can be used to achieve the <br />desired result. In these cases, the component can be <br />designed by the contractor, within the specified criteria, <br />and reviewed and accepted by the engineer. When <br />deciding whether these components are best designed by <br />the contractor after award, or ahead of time by the <br />engineer, one should consider the relative sensitivity of <br />the component in terms of potential impact to quality <br />and schedule of work, as well as the relative dam safety <br />risk if the contractor’s method proves inadequate or <br />inefficient. As a general rule of thumb, a contractor’s <br />design, which is being cost-competitively bid, is usually <br />more aggressive (less conservative) than if it were pre- <br />designed by the engineer of record. <br />1.River Diversion – A diversion plan for dealing with <br />river or watershed flows is generally necessary to limit <br />the potential for site flooding and to allow the <br />contractor to complete the work in the dry. Diversion <br />systems will generally consist of a cofferdam designed <br />to withstand a particular flood event of a given <br />frequency (e.g., 25-year flood), which is related to the <br />expected construction period and the consequences <br />of failure. This may include channels, conduits, chutes, <br />tunnels, or flumes around the work area to pass flows <br />around the work site. <br />For projects where the primary risk of failure of the <br />diversion system is to the contractor’s completed <br />work or to his equipment and work areas, it may be <br />beneficial to allow the contractor to determine his <br />own level of risk tolerance, within appropriate limits. <br />Consider allowing the contractor to include as a bid <br />item one “clean-up” following an abnormally high <br />flood event, with “abnormally high” being well- <br />defined in the specification. The definition should be <br />clear to limit the allowance only to natural events that <br />would endanger the contractor’s work area but not <br />pose a risk to the dam in its fragile state. This <br />approach of “sharing the risk” removes a level of <br />contractor uncertainty. When uncertainty is reduced, <br />bid prices are normally lower. <br />In cases where significant normal stream flows exist <br />and/or where risks to population and development <br />downstream of the work area are present, it is usually <br />prudent for the engineer to design the river diversion <br />requirements in advance, avoiding team-effort <br />specifications.