My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
DWR_2801674
DWR
>
Reference Library
>
2015
>
10
>
DWR_2801674
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2017 11:33:02 AM
Creation date
10/6/2015 9:53:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reference Library
Title
WESTERN DAM ENGINEERING NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1, MARCH 2013
Author/Source
URS
Keywords
SIPHONING, LOW LEVEL CONDUITS, FILTER DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
Document Type - Reference Library
Research, Thesis, Technical Publications
Document Date
3/31/2013
Year
2013
Team/Office
Dam Safety
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />11 <br />available, commercially-produced aggregates. Use of <br />readily available materials can significantly reduce <br />project costs. It is very unusual when readily-available <br />commercial materials cannot be found to meet filter <br />requirements. Typical readily-available commercial <br />materials include ASTM, AASHTO, and state <br />transportation department standard gradations. After <br />the required filter gradations are calculated, <br />gradations of readily-available materials should be <br />reviewed for compliance. The availability of local <br />suppliers producing the desired gradations should be <br />verified before the gradations are specified. <br />For most mixtures of sands, silts, and clays found in <br />dams and foundations, ASTM C33 fine aggregate will <br />meet filter requirements. Although, ASTM C33 fine <br />aggregate is a suitable filter for a wide range of soils, <br />the filter calculations should always be completed for <br />the particular base soils being protected, to verify the <br />suitability of the specified filter. If ASTM C-33 fine <br />aggregate is suitable as a filter, then ASTM coarse <br />aggregate gradation No. 8, AASHTO coarse aggregate <br />gradation No. 8, or a similar transportation <br />department specification is a suitable, filter- <br />compatible drain material. <br />If a drain pipe is included in the filter and drain system, <br />the slots or perforations in the pipe must be sized to <br />be filter-compatible with the soil material that <br />surrounds the pipe. The guidelines published by the <br />three federal agencies referenced above provide <br />criteria for appropriately sizing pipe slots or <br />perforations, although there are some variations <br />among the three documents in this regard. <br />Currently, the guidelines and policies of the principal <br />federal agencies involved in dam design, construction, <br />and operation indicate that geotextiles are not to be <br />used for critical filter functions in dams and at <br />locations that could not be relatively easily accessed <br />for replacement. This includes geocomposite drains in <br />lieu of sand filters. This is due to the potential for <br />geotextiles to clog over time, be damaged during <br />installation, or deteriorate over time. Clogging can lead <br />to increased pore pressures within the dam, which <br />may be unacceptable. Damage or deterioration could <br />compromise filter function. <br />For zoned embankments the chimney filter should be <br />located immediately downstream of the core. In recent <br />years the application of risk analysis to dam seepage <br />issues has led many practitioners to design chimney <br />filters that extend up to an elevation equal to the <br />normal pool. Based on the potential for cracking and <br />dispersion, filters may be extended to the flood pool <br />level or even the dam crest. <br />Now let’s look at some items to consider during <br />construction of the embankment filter. <br />Constructing Embankment Filters <br />In design of a chimney filter drain, analyses are <br />normally completed to determine the thickness of the <br />filter and drain zones required to convey the estimated <br />seepage flow rates. Normally these calculations result <br />in relatively thin filter and drain zones and layers. In <br />reality, the design thicknesses of the filter and drain <br />layers are normally controlled by consideration of <br />constructability, not seepage flow capacity <br />requirements. In considering constructability, the <br />designer must address the question of how thick must <br />each zone be to ensure that the zone is continuous, <br />with no interruptions. In typical filter and drain <br />construction, the filter and drain materials are <br />delivered to the dam in dump trucks and moved into <br />the final location by loaders, dozers, or graders, after <br />which they are compacted. Placement of chimney <br />drains using this methodology is subject to what has <br />been called the “Christmas tree effect.” This effect can <br />result in portions of the filter not meeting the <br />minimum specified thicknesses. As discussed earlier in <br />this article, filter and drain materials are most <br />commonly commercially-produced, processed <br />materials, and, therefore, are expensive. As a result, <br />there are always pressures to reduce the thicknesses <br />of these materials and reduce cost. It is essential to <br />resist any pressures to reduce filter and drain zone <br />thicknesses to dimensions less than those that will <br />reasonably assure satisfactory construction. <br /> <br />Photo 1: “Christmas Tree” Effect <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.