My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
DWR_2801674
DWR
>
Reference Library
>
2015
>
10
>
DWR_2801674
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2017 11:33:02 AM
Creation date
10/6/2015 9:53:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reference Library
Title
WESTERN DAM ENGINEERING NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1, MARCH 2013
Author/Source
URS
Keywords
SIPHONING, LOW LEVEL CONDUITS, FILTER DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
Document Type - Reference Library
Research, Thesis, Technical Publications
Document Date
3/31/2013
Year
2013
Team/Office
Dam Safety
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br />effectively lowering embankment phreatic levels and <br />protecting the critical zones of the embankment. The <br />size or thickness of the filter zone is important to <br />ensure it meets necessary capacity requirements and <br />also provides ample thickness to assure continuity <br />during placement and to prevent contamination during <br />construction. <br />Let’s focus first on the filter gradation design. Detailed <br />guidance documents for gradation design for soil filters <br />are readily available from three federal agencies: the <br />U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources <br />Conservation Service (NRCS) [NRCS (1994)]; the U.S. <br />Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation <br />(Reclamation) [Reclamation (2007)]; and the U.S. Army <br />Corps of Engineers (USACE) [USACE (2004b)]. This <br />article does not include a repetition of the detailed <br />guidance included in the three documents referenced <br />above, all of which are readily available. Rather, this <br />article presents a general discussion of the NRCS <br />method, highlighting some of the important practical <br />aspects of the guidance. <br />The NRCS method for filter gradation design is <br />summarized in 11 steps. The 11 eleven steps are not <br />reiterated in this article; however a brief discussion <br />presenting the goals of the various steps is provided <br />below. <br />Steps 1 through 5 of the procedure establish the <br />criteria that must be met to provide a filter that will <br />prevent movement of soil particles from the base soil <br />(the soil being protected) into the filter – the filter <br />function. Mathematical regrading of the base soil is <br />performed in these steps and is a critical part of the <br />filter design process. <br />Step 6 establishes criteria to assure that the filter is <br />significantly higher in permeability (hydraulic <br />conductivity) than the base soil – the drainage <br />function. <br />Steps 7 and 8 are intended to prevent the filter from <br />being gap graded. A gap graded filter is a soil <br />composed of particles of two different gradation <br />ranges, e,g, gravel and fine sand, with very little if any <br />of the intermediate grain sizes, e.g. coarse and <br />medium sand. Gap graded soils can be internally <br />unstable; that is the coarse fraction does not serve as a <br />filter to the fine fraction, and the fine fraction can be <br />eroded out through the coarse fraction. <br />Steps 9 through 10 are intended to produce a filter <br />gradation that will limit the likelihood of particle size <br />segregation during placement of the filter. <br />Segregation of the filter into coarser and finer zones <br />can result in coarse zones which do not provide the <br />required filter function. <br />If a particular design does not require that the filter <br />meet permeability requirements, the permeability <br />criterion, Step 5, can be relaxed, as long as the filter <br />criterion, the gap graded criteria, and the segregation <br />criteria are met. An example of where this might apply <br />would be a filter for a core, with a very permeable, <br />filter-compatible shell downstream of the filter. In this <br />case, the downstream shell would serve the drainage <br />(permeability) function, lowering the phreatic surface <br />immediately downstream of the filter. <br />If it is typically desired that the filter has high <br />permeability (hydraulic conductivity),it is <br />recommended that the filters have less than 3% <br />nonplastic fines (material finer than the No. 200 sieve <br />size), in place, before compaction, and at most 5% <br />nonplastic fines, in place, after compaction. <br />Permeability of the filter decreases dramatically as the <br />fines content increases above these levels. <br />It is very rare to find a case where natural materials <br />can satisfactorily serve as filters, without significant <br />processing. Natural materials are typically not suitable <br />as filters for the following reasons: <br />• The required gradations requirements for filters <br />are relatively narrow, and the variation in <br />gradations in natural deposits is typically too great <br />to be confident that all of the material obtained <br />from a natural source will be within the specified <br />narrow limits. <br />• It is generally desirable for filters to have very low <br />fines contents, less than 3 to 5 percent, as <br />discussed above. It is very unusual to find natural <br />deposits that reliably have such low fines contents. <br />• Natural deposits often have enough coarse <br />particles that they do not meet the filter <br />requirements to prevent segregation during <br />placement. <br />It is not necessary that the exact gradation limits <br />resulting from the filter calculations be used in the <br />project specifications. Rather, the calculated <br />gradations can be used to select and specify readily-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.