My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
DWR_2801672
DWR
>
Reference Library
>
2015
>
10
>
DWR_2801672
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2017 11:33:02 AM
Creation date
10/6/2015 9:52:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reference Library
Title
WESTERN DAM ENGINEERING NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, ISSUE 3, NOVEMBER 2013
Author/Source
URS
Keywords
EMBANKMENT SLOPE STABILITY, RAIN, DESIGN PRECIPITATION DEPTHS, SPECS, EARTHWORK CONSIDERATIONS
Document Type - Reference Library
Research, Thesis, Technical Publications
Document Date
11/30/2013
Year
2013
Team/Office
Dam Safety
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />8 <br />bound of 90% confidence interval for the 1,000-year <br />precipitation event. <br />The September event is a reminder of the importance <br />of designing a dam for the appropriate precipitation <br />event and hazard classification. Flooding did result <br />from the low hazard dam failures; however, there was <br />little flooding from the state-classified high hazard <br />dams, where failure would likely result in widespread <br />damage and loss of human life, because these dams <br />were designed appropriately for the PMP event. <br />State Criteria for Design Precipitation <br />The state criterion for determination of the dam design <br />precipitation is based upon dam size and hazard <br />classification. The hazard classification typically <br />accounts for dam height, storage capacity, likelihood of <br />failure (e.g. a dam located within a series of dams), and <br />potential for loss of life and property, should a failure <br />occur. The following discussion summarizes the hazard <br />classification system and methods used to identify the <br />dam design precipitation for Colorado, Utah, Montana, <br />and Wyoming. <br />For Colorado, design precipitation is selected based <br />upon dam size and hazard classification as presented in <br />Table 1. Additional guidelines are available for altitude <br />adjustments in the Colorado Rules and Regulations for <br />Dam Safety and Dam Construction. <br />Table 1: Colorado Inflow Design Flood Requirements <br />Note: NPH = No Public Hazard Dam. This table was taken from <br />Table 5.2 of the Office of the State Engineer Dam Safety Branch’s <br />“Rules and Regulations for Dam Safety and Dam Construction,” <br />dated January 1, 2007. <br />For Utah, design precipitation is selected based upon <br />hazard classification as determined by the State <br />Engineer. Design precipitation for all low hazard dams <br />is the 100-year event, whereas significant and high <br />hazard dams must use the Spillway Evaluation Flood <br />(SEF). The SEF is defined as the most critical flood of <br />either the 100-year event applied to a saturated <br />watershed or one of the PMP events. <br />For Montana, all dams with a potential for loss of life <br />due to failure are classified as high hazard and the <br />minimum design precipitation considered for any <br />impoundment greater than 50 acre-feet is the 500- <br />year event. Design precipitation for all high hazard <br />dams is determined following a loss of life analysis <br />using the requirements summarized in Table 2. <br />Table 2: Montana Design Flood Requirements <br /> <br />This table was taken from Montana’s Rules and Regulations, Rule <br />36.14.502 entitled, “Hydrologic Standard for Emergency and <br />Principal Spillways”. <br />For Wyoming, determination of design precipitation <br />and dam hazard classification is at the discretion of the <br />State Engineer. Additionally, all reservoirs with a dam <br />height greater than 20 feet, storage capacity greater <br />than 50 acre-feet, and/or a reservoir located in an area <br />where extensive property damage or loss of life might <br />result, are required to have a minimum design <br />precipitation of the 100-year event. <br />State rules and regulations typically prescribe the <br />minimum criteria and not necessarily the method for <br />satisfying the criteria. For example, a common <br />requirement for low hazard dams is the 100-year <br />event. This design criterion is typically the 100-year, <br />24-hour rainfall with a specific temporal distribution of <br />hourly rainfall. Hydrological guidelines are then <br />followed to determine the Design Flood. Alternately, <br />the 100-year flood can be derived from actual stream <br />gauge data collected within the drainage area or a <br />similar nearby drainage area. The reader is cautioned <br />to work with each state’s dam regulatory agency to <br />High Significant Low NPH <br />Large 0.90 PMP 0.68 PMP 100 YR 50 YR <br />Small 0.90 PMP 0.45 PMP 100 YR 25 YR <br />Minor 0.45 PMP 100 YR 50 YR 25 YR <br /> INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD REQUIREMENTS FOR COLORADO USING <br />HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL REPORTS (HMR) <br />DAM SIZE HAZARD CLASSIFICATION <br />Loss of Life (LOL)Design Flood <br />Less than or Equal to 0.5 500 YR <br />0.5 to 5 LOL x 1000 <br />5 to 1000 <br />P s = P5,000 (10rd) <br />Where: <br />r = -0.304 + .435 log10 (lol) <br />d = log10 (PMP) - log10 (P5,000) <br />lol = estimated loss of life PMP = probable <br />maximum precipitation <br />P 5,000 = 5,000-year recurrence interval <br />precipitation <br />P s = design precipitation to meet spillway <br />standard <br />Greater Than 1000 Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.