My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-05-25_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-05-25_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:33:48 PM
Creation date
6/22/2011 10:16:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/25/2011
Doc Name
2nd Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
Marcia Talvitie
To
Michael Boulay
Email Name
MPB
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Date: 25 May 2011 John W. Hickenlooper <br />Governor <br />To: Michael P. Boulay, Lead Specialist Mike Kin <br />Executive Director <br />From: Marcia L. Talvitie, P.E. Loretta E. Pineaa <br />Director <br />RE: Fruita Loadout — Permit Application No. C- 2010 -088 <br />2" Preliminary Adequacy Review — Engineering / Geotechnical <br />As requested in your memo dated 19- Apr -2011, I have reviewed the April adequacy response <br />package for the Fruita Loadout submitted by J.E. Stover & Associates on behalf of CAM - <br />Colorado, LLC. In my 22- Nov -2010 preliminary review of the original application, I provided a <br />list of 13 adequacy items. Each of these items is listed here below, along with the number used <br />in your official Preliminary Adequacy Review letter of 30- Nov -2010. <br />Rule 2.04.6 Geology Description <br />1(6) Various changes to the wording of Section 2.04.6 were requested. <br />Each item was successfully addressed with the adequacy response. Item resolved <br />Rule 2.05.3(3) Mine Facilities <br />2(46) Section 2.05.3(3)(a) and (c) discuss the proposed mine facilities. For each facility listed, <br />please identify the map or maps on which the facility is depicted. <br />The requested information was added to pages 2.05 -5 and 2.05 -8. Item resolved <br />Rail Loop and Bridge <br />3(51) The plan and profile of the proposed rail loop is provided on Map 21; there is very little <br />other information presented within the application. Based on communication with Ms. <br />Stover - Bishop, Union Pacific railroad has its own detailed requirements governing the <br />construction of embankments. Please provide a summary of those requirements for <br />inclusion within the permit text. Otherwise, the Division will need to require that the <br />embankments be constructed in accordance with the Rules for roads and embankments. <br />Page 2.05 -9 was revised, and Union Pacific rail line specifications were incorporated <br />into the application as Exhibit 16 The UP specifications are, however, incomplete. <br />Only odd - numbered pages have been provided Please incorporate the missing pages <br />into Exhibit 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.