My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-12-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2001-12-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2016 9:44:23 AM
Creation date
11/26/2010 3:36:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
pages 2-577 to 2-592
Section_Exhibit Name
2.8 Aquatic Communities & 2.9 Archaeologic, Cultural and Historical Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.8 AQUATIC COMMUNITIES <br />Section 2.7.4 of this application discusses [he drainage classifications (i.e. <br />perennial, intermittent or ephemeral) wi[hi^ the proposed mine plan area. <br />Stearns-Roger (1974) stated [here are no small streams or ponds of consequence in <br />the area of interest (lands associated with [he Craig Generating Station or Trap- <br />per Mine). The Yampa River is the nearest perennial stream to the mine plan area <br />but remains more than one (1) mile (1.6 km) away from [he proposed boundaries <br />(Map M43). <br />Four (4) significant drainages will be affected within the mine plan area. How- <br />ever, only the upper reaches of each will be disturbed. Those drainages are <br />Johnson Gulch, Pyeatt Gulch, Flume Gulch and No-Name Gulch. Map M43 depicts <br />their relationship [o the mine plan area. The sections of these drainages, [o be <br />affected, have ephemeral flows that are the direct result of significant precipi- <br />tation events or snowmelt runoff during the spring. The lower sections of these <br />• networks (below 6,800 feet MSL) become intermittent from in[erflow of ground <br />water seeps and/or springs along [heir courses. <br />Three (3) springs or stream origins were pin-pointed following aerial reconnais- <br />sance, scrutiny of topographic maps, discussions with long-term residents and <br />completion of a ground search (Ecology Consultants, Inc. 1972). Only one of <br />these, No-Name Gulch, will be affected by [he proposed mining activities. <br />Descriptions of these sites are presented in Ecology Consultant's study (1972). <br />Field sampling of macroinver[ebrates from all water sources within and immediate- <br />ly adjacent to [he proposed mine plan area were conducted by Utah International <br />environmental personnel during 1979. The purpose of these investigations was to <br />describe [he species of macroinvertebrates occurring in the drainage networks <br />within the proposed mine plan area. <br />The study area, the investigation methods, [he species obtained and [he taxonomic <br />verifications are presented in Appendix J, Aquatic Communities. The monitoring <br />. points and surveyed sections of drainageways are depicted in Map M44. <br />~. <br />~~~ <br />2-577 n~-~'f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.