2010-08-23_REVISION - M1994108 ‎(4)‎

• Permit No: M1994108
• IBM Index Class Name: REVISION
• Doc Date: 8/23/2010
• Doc Name: Adequacy Review
• From: DRMS
• To: Wasteline, Inc.
• Type & Sequence: AM1
• Email Name: KAP
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
COLORADO
D I V I S I O N O F
RECLAMATION
MINING-
- SAFETY
Bill Ritter, Jr.
Governor
Mike King
Executive Director
August 23, 2010 Loretta Pineda
Director
Nathan Barton
Wasteline, Inc.
P.O. Box 88 CMEIVED
Cortez, CO 81321-0088
[? 13 1
RE: Noland Inc, File No. M-1994-108 Division
Cedar Point I I2(c) Permit Amendment (AM-O1) Application - Adequacy Review

Dear Mr. Barton,
Listed below are adequacy review comments for the Cedar Point 112 (c) Permit Amendment Application, File No.
M-1994-108. The decision date for this permit application is October 6, 2010. The Division of Reclamation,
Mining, and Safety (Division) is required to make a decision by October 6, 2010. Therefore, your response to the
following adequacy review concerns should be submitted to the Division as soon as possible.
1. As required by Rule 1.6.5 (2), please submit the proof of publication of the public notice circulated in the
local newspaper and all owners of record of surface lands, and easement holders that are on the affected land and
within 200 feet of the boundary of the affected land. Proof of notice may be return receipts of a Certified Mailing
or by proof of personal service.
2. Application Form - The information regarding Permitted Acreage, item #3, is not clear as to the current
permitted acreage, the acreage proposed to be added, and the final proposed total acreage. The information on the
application form also does not correlate with that contained in the application. Please submit a new page one of
the application with the corrected acreage information.
Rule 6.4.4 Exhibit D - Mining Plan °
3. The submitted Mining Plan states, "Additional areas will be used for stockpile of pit run, product,
overburden, soil,..." If the areas that will be used for these activities are not included in the 10 acres used for
processing plants and hot mix asphalt facilities, please specify how much additional land will be used for the
stockpiling activities. 11,
4. Item number 3 under Assumptions, in the submitted Mining Plan state, "Based on the normal requirement
to provide six inches for rooting zone/soil on reclaimed areas, it is estimated that only acre-feet of a required acre-
feet of soil (44%0 will be available for final reclamation." Please clarify this statement.
5. The section titled Stripping and Mining Technique in the submitted mining plan states, "Soil may be
screened to remove roots and larger materials for processing and sale or use,..." Elsewhere in the application it
states that there will not be enough topsoil at the site to supply 6 inches of topsoil for reclamation purposes. Please
be aware that if there is not enough topsoil present at the site for the reclamation specified, no topsoil may be sold.
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines-