Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 2 <br />Rule 6.4.5 Exhibit E - Reclamation Plan <br />6. The submitted Reclamation Plan states that some areas of the reclaimed site will have slopes of 211:1 V. <br />Please be aware that these slopes are too steep for areas to be used as pasture. Therefore the areas to be reclaimed <br />as pasture land will need to have gentler slopes. <br />7. The submitted application states that the seed mix to be used will be determined at a later date. Yet in the <br />reclamation plan, the revegetation proposal contains a seed mix. The Division needs to know what seed mix will <br />be used in order to calculate the reclamation bond. Unless an alternative seed mix is submitted during the review <br />process, the one contained in the submitted reclamation will be used for the bond calculation. <br />Please be advised that the Noland Inc., Cedar Point Pit 112(c) Permit Amendment Application may be deemed <br />inadequate, and the application may be denied October 6, 2010 unless the above mentioned adequacy review items <br />are addressed to the satisfaction of the Division. Responses to these adequacy concerns must be received by the <br />Division to allow adequate time for review prior to the decision date. If you feel more time is needed to complete <br />your reply, the Division can grant an extension to the ,decision date. This will be done upon receipt of a written <br />waiver of your right to a decision by October 6, 2010 and request for additional time. This request must be <br />received no later than October 6, 2010. Please be aware that depending on the answers that are received regarding <br />the above adequacy issues, the Division may have further adequacy questions. The Division may also have <br />additional adequacy questions once the site has undergone an inspection related to this application. <br />If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (970) 259-5861. <br />Sincerely, <br />of <br />K to Pickford <br />Environmental Protection Specialist