My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-17_PERMIT FILE - M2008009
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008009
>
2008-04-17_PERMIT FILE - M2008009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:28:04 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 7:59:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008009
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/17/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary adequacy review
From
DRMS
To
3b Enterprises, LLC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETv <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 ~~~~~~~ <br />2 ~. ~oaa <br />APR Lion, <br />April 17, 2008 of y~eciama <br />Division and Safety <br />Mining <br />Mr. Steve Baker <br />3B Enterprises, LLC <br />P.O. Box 1665 <br />Craig, CO 81626 <br />~q„ auo~ - ov9 <br />Re: Lyster Pit, 112 Permit Application No. M-200 ,Preliminary Adequacy Review. <br />Dear Mr. Baker: <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION O F <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />- &- <br />SAF ETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety has begun the review process for the above referenced 112 <br />amendment application. The project appears to be a straight forward construction material extraction and <br />processing operation. A review of the application has revealed a few issues and clarifications to address. <br />1) Rule 6.4.7(1) requires the operator to directly state if surface water or groundwater will be affected by the mining <br />operation. The applicant stated that groundwater would not be affected by mining activities; this is an incorrect <br />statement considering that mining operations will expose groundwater. Our records search with the Office of <br />the State Engineer (Division of Water Resources) indicates that 4 wells are permitted with in 1,300 feet of <br />the proposed mine. In that these wells are alluvial groundwater wells, they may be impacted by the mining <br />operation. In accordance with Rule 6.4.7(2)(b), the Division requests that the applicant identify and characterize <br />the aquifer to be mined in or through. The Division also requests that the applicant define or predict the cone of <br />depression expected for any areas to be dewatered. The cone of depression and assessment of other effects <br />should define, at a minimum, the horizontal and vertical extent of expected impacts. If during the assessment, <br />the applicant determines that a drawdown effect will occur offsite that Inay impact a current groundwater user, <br />the applicant should explain any mitigation measures to be implemented and trigger points that would cause <br />mitigation measures to be put into effect. The Applicant will also need to establish a baseline for the current <br />groundwater levels tllrough at least 5 quarters of groundwater level measurement. <br />2) The applicant should be aware that Rule 3.1.6 (1) of the Construction Material Rules and Regulations <br />require that disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic balance of the affected land and to the surrounding <br />area. and to the quantity and quality of water in surface and groundwater systems both during and after the <br />mining operation and during reclamation shall be minimized. In that the proposed operation includes <br />dewatering of the pits, the potential for impacts to groundwater exists. Please indicate how the hydrologic <br />balance of groundwater in and around the permit site will be monitored. <br />3) Per Rule 6.4.4 (c), please provide more detail as to which direction the water will flow during mining and <br />what methods will be used to de-water during mining operations. Please clarify where water from the mine <br />will be discharged and provide a singed affidavit that indicates that the operator has consent to discharge <br />water into the proposed water conveying structure. <br />4) Per Rule 3.1.10 (5), to insure the establishment of a diverse and long lasting vegetative cover, the operator <br />shall employ appropriate techniques of site preparation and protection such as mechanical soil conditioning <br />by discing and ripping; mulching; soil amendments and fertilizers; and irrigation. What methods will the <br />operator employ to insure successful establishment of vegetation. <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver Grand Junction Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.