REP52006

• Permit No: C1984063
• IBM Index Class Name: Report
• Doc Date: 2/10/1999
• Doc Name: MEMO FINDING OF COMPLIANCE 1998 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT
• From: DMG
• To: FILE C-84-063 EASTSIDE MINE
• Permit Index Doc Type: HYDROLOGY REPORT
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

a~AT~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEO~(~GN
Depanmenr of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman Sr., Room 215
D I v 15 l O N O F
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone] MINERAL S
FA%: [phone] &

interoffice GEE ~ n ~ ION
MINING•SAFETY
MEMORANDUM
gil I Owens
Governor

to: File C-84-063 Eastside Mine Greg E. Walther
Executive Director
Michael B. Lang
/-f. 1."/`~
from: BvroctjG. Walker Division DireUOr
subject: Finding of Compliance, 1998 Annual Hydrology Report
date: February l0, 1999
Rule 4.OS.13(d)(c): A hydrologic repa•t shall be submitted to [he Division annually with the date
of submittal determined in carsultation with the pennutee. The mmual hydrologic report shall
contain at a minimum:
The report was received in the Division of Minerals and Geology (Division) on February 10, 1999
under a Stephen Self letter of January 28, 1999. No submittal date is stated in the permit ("An
annual hydrology report will be submitted to the Division after completion of the calendar year."
This might be a mid-term review item.).
Rule 4.05.14(4)(c)(i): Water yrrantity data obtained front each monitoring site during the water
yem ;
The report is incompliance with this rule with the approved exception that water quantity data was
submitted by calendar year in-lieu-of water year (Permit, page 59).
Rule 4.05.14(4)(c)(ii): Water quality data obtained from each monitoringsite dru•ing the water year;
and
The report is in compliance with this rule with the approved exception that water quality data was
submitted by calendar year in-lieu-of water year (Permit, page 59).
Rule 4.05.1=1(4)(c)(iii): /f required by dle Division, a written interpretation of the date and
iderttificatiort of mining related impacts to the hydrologic balance.
The report is in compliance with this rule. There is no requirement in the Permit for a written
interpretation of the data, but a summary of impacts is provided in the report. Impacts are reported
as within the probable hydraulic consequences anticipated in the Permit (Report, page 5). The table