Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />999 <br />November 18, 1977 <br />Cotter Corporation <br />P.O. Box 700 <br />Nucla, Colorado 81424 <br />P.E: Adequacy Review. LP-21 Mina. Our file 077-305. <br />Dear Mr. Hugus: <br />I have listed below several points in your recent permit application which <br />need clarification or additional information prior to presentation before <br />the Board. These points do not include questions which may arise ae a <br />result of my initial inspection. <br />1) Application Fee: <br />a) The application fee was incorrectly computed. The correct fee is <br />$200. The additional S1.50 should be forwarded to this office. <br />2) Legal Description: <br />a) The legal description should include the principal meridian. <br />3) Maps: <br />a) The maps submitted as Exhibit C should clearly show the affected area. <br />b) The vegetation map should show the approximate boundaries of the <br />different vegetation types in the area. <br />4) Nine Plan: <br />a) Your mine plan and map both mention a topsoil stockpile, however, the <br />source of this topsoil and thn depth to which it was removed was not <br />discussed. <br />b) Any water encountered in the mine that is reused for drilling will <br />require an adjudication of water vrights. I have enclosed a copy <br />of the water resources memo for your informatioa. <br />c) You are advised to be certain that you have allowed an adequate "bulfer" <br />cone between the permit boundary and the limit of preeant operations in <br />order to avoid future permit boundary problems. <br />