Laserfiche WebLink
,~ IIIIIINIIIIIIIIIII~ <br />March 20, 1978 <br />Mr. James L. Schmieding <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 723 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Schmieding, <br /> <br />VALCO, INC. <br />GENERAL OFFICES <br />P. O. BOX 550 <br />ROCKY FORD, COLORADO 81067 <br />(303)254-7464 <br />Re Valco, Inc. - Pueblo West Pit - MLR File No. 77-573 <br />Division of Water Resources Memorandum, March 7, 1978 <br />We appreciate your forwarding to us a copy of the Division of <br />Water Resources memorandum concerning our operations at the <br />Pueblo West Pit. <br />Living and working in the Arkansas Valley as we do at Valco, <br />we are aware of water problems in the Valley. Much of our <br />product goes into concrete irrigation ditches and other water <br />facilities. In our operating area throughout the Valley we <br />continually attempt to conserve water and minimize the <br />effects of our operations on the hydrologic balance. We <br />feel we are doing a good job in this respect. <br />Dr. Danielson's staff may have missed a few items in review- <br />ing our application, This is quite understandable in light <br />of the number of applications being processed at this time. <br />Our comments with respect to the items delineated in the <br />memorandum follow. They are numbered to conform to the para- <br />graph numbers in the memorandum. <br />1. Map Exhibits C, C-1, D-1 and F indicate that the Hamp- <br />Bell Ditch is never closer than 50 feet and is usually further <br />than 80 feet from the areas to be dewatered. To date dewatering <br />has had no effect on the nearby wells in the area or on the <br />Hamp-Bell Ditch. The closest dewatering that could affect <br />the two wells mentioned in the DWR memorandum is approximately <br />one-half mile to the southwest; wells as close as 300 feet <br />have not been affected up to now by dewatering. It is not <br />expected that downstream dewatering, which is lower on the <br />potentiometric surface, would affect these wells. <br />We appreciate the DWR identifying to us a well owned <br />by the City of Pueblo which they claim is adjacent to the <br />east side of Area 4. We were unaware this well existed. The <br />best property description of the well location we can obtain <br />from DWR records is somewhere within the NW/4 NE/4 Section 33, <br />T20S, R65W, 6th P.M. Since our east property line is the <br />Arkansas River, we can only assume the well in question <br />is on the other side of the river between 130 and 1300 feet <br />from the area to be dewatered in the year 2008. From our <br />past experience with dewatering in this area, we do not <br />believe the City of Pueblo well on the north side of the <br />river will be affected. <br />LAMAR CANON CITY PUEBLO <br />