Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION Of MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room z l s C O L D RA D O <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 - A~ DIVISION O F <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 ~~~ M I N S RRA L S <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 ~ (i E O L O G Y <br />A~jpR ~ 0.ECLAMATION•MININL <br />gg SAFETY•SCIENCE <br />Of ~~nr~Q~~ <br />~~~ ~ Bill Owens <br />~' April 13> 2004 9i~y ~~~!«ea Governor <br />Russell George <br />$111 Lyle Executive Director <br />~ Idarado Mining Co. Ronald w. Gttany <br />Go Newmont Mining Co. Divisi°^ DirMOr <br />1700 LIDCOln St., SUlte 3600 Natural Resource Trustee <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />~ d <br />RE: Idazado Mine, DMG Permit M-1977-403 HR, Revision of Existing Reclamation Plans. <br />------ ~° <br />The meeting we had here earlier this week was very productive, and I appreciate the time you spent traveling here <br />and discussing the current conditions of the Idazado Mine and the future plans to reclaim it. Much of the <br />reclamation has been carried out under the conditions imposed by the CDPHE Consent Decree, and as detailed in <br />the Remedial Action Plan (RAP), which may or may not have been within the DMG permitted azea. As noted <br />during the discussion, there aze numerous areas within the DMG permitted area which have been fully or partially <br />reclaimed. It is important that these aeeas and the reclamation carried out therein be identified so that we can assess <br />whether the reclamation itself is consistent with the details in the approved reclamation plan. <br />It has been observed by this office that the reclamation carried out by Idarado has been of high quality and has <br />resulted in stable aeeas and decreased on- and offsite contamination, and is moving the site closer to productive <br />post-mining land uses. This office is interested in Idazado's efforts not only to reclaim, but to update the approved <br />reclamation plan in the permit. Therefore, the enclosed materials should be used as a start in determining which <br />aspects of the permit plans currently do not reflect the direction taken in reclamation, and working to revise those <br />aspects. <br />The enclosed materials are taken from the DMG reclamation permit file. Most of the materials date from the 10/77 <br />permit application packet, and a minor amount of the materials dates from this office's 1998-99 review of the <br />permit file as it relates to the reclamation described in the CDPHE Consent Decree/RAP. As we agreed, many of <br />the areas being reclaimed under the Consent Decree do not fall within the DMG reclamation permit. <br />The 1977 application materials prepared by Idarado were in great detail, and arranged in outline form. Enclosed <br />are the Application Form, Exhibits C (Mining Map), Exhibit D (Mining Plan), Exhibit E (Reclamation Plan), <br />Exhibit F (Reclamation Map), Exhibit H (Soils) and Exhibit L (Reclamation Costs), and finally the Reclamation <br />Permit. I have color coded most of those materials to facilitate separating the descriptions and activities by their <br />geographic azea. For example, if the Pandora Mill azea is of interest, the text circled in green should be reviewed, <br />etc. <br />One of the last documents is a brief guide to specific portions of the RAP which deal with areas under the Consent <br />Decree and also the DMG reclamation permit. The text referenced in that guide point to all the reclamation details <br />of the RAP that fall within the DMG permit. One will see by comparing the 1977 DMG permit plans to the RAP <br />plans that the two reclamation plans of those aeeas often do not correlate. These aze one group of aeeas that <br />specifically must be brought up-to-date. The other group of aeeas is those that aze included only in the DMG <br />permitted azea but not covered by the RAP (the 13-plus acres of the Red Mountain Plant, for example). <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />