My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42454
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42454
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:03 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:47:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/9/1989
Doc Name
SENECA II ANNUAL TOPOGRAPHY MAP
From
MLRD
To
SUSAN MOWRY CARL MOUNT
Permit Index Doc Type
RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />999 <br />STATE OF CO <br />Roy Romer, Governor <br />r~ R <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Dlrsctor <br />DATE: August 9, 1989 <br />T0: Susan Mowry, Carl tdount <br />FROM: Tim King <br />RE: Seneca II Annual Topography Map <br />After reviewing the annual topographic maps submitted by Peabody Coal Company <br />for the Seneca II Mine, I have many concerns. They are listed below. <br />t. In cross-section F, a depression of approximately 43.75 feet appears. <br />he general regrading requirements of the Seneca II permit, Section <br />„ ,!J 14.2(3) states, "Small depressions are not proposed in the post mining <br />~'( opography except where they were pre-existing." Because of unavailable <br />pre-mining topographic maps, I was unabl to tell if the depression v/as <br />pre-existing. Soli tic l0 - ~ ~ (~'~ - w~"^ ~ -Fa~° - b,.~ c~o~lf <br />-Gor ce,,,..part so-~ S~ 1 ,~ <br />2. Cross-sections C & D show more material in place than proposed, of <br />approximately 50 feet more depth in cross-section C and approximately <br />30 feet more depth in cross-section D. In his letter of July 7, 1989, <br />Ron Gehrke states, "We do not believe this area to be a problem, but will <br />observe the future grading to ensure that adequate material is available <br />to reclaim the future pits." He has not stated how he plans to ensure <br />adequate material for the future. Also, it is not clear why more <br />material was put down in the first place. <br />3. In these areas where more material was placed than proposed <br />(cross-sections C, D, and E), nothing is said of stability <br />~o-~ e. I Z - S 7 <br />The general grading requirements of the Seneca II Permit, <br />^4r1-4:271T states, "The final graded slopes will not be uniform, but will <br />approximate the pre-mining slopes as shown by Exhibit 12-9, Post-Mining <br />Contour Map." I am unable to understand how Peabody Coal Company can <br />show pre-mining topography on a post-mining topography map. As I <br />mentioned in number 1 above, no pre-mining topography map seems to exist <br />for the Seneca II Mine. <br />k~.~ <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.