Laserfiche WebLink
:~ <br />Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David H. Getcnea, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTO N, Director <br />DATE: April 25, 1984 <br />T0: Sandy Emrich <br />FROM: P. C. Saletta <br />RE: Stipulation Review - Empire Energy Corporation Eagle No. 5 and No. 9 <br />Mines - Permit No. C-044-81 <br />As per your request, I reviewed the response to Stipulations No. 16 and No. 18 <br />as submitted by Empire Energy Corporation. <br />Stipulation No. 16 <br />The response to Stipulation No. 16 is adequate. In review of Map IV-10 <br />Reclamation Map and cross-section Drawings IV-14 through IV-24, I find that <br />there is sufficient information to verify the accuracy of post-mining <br />topography and volumetrics presented on Table IU-6. All cross-sections except <br />for B-B' baseline (No. 5 Portal) have pre and post-mining contours drawn on <br />Map IV-10. The No. 5 Portal area does not have post mine contours clearly <br />drawn on Map IV-10. However, the cross-sections are clearly and accurately <br />drawn on Drawings IU-22, IV-23 and IV-24. If the operator has committed to <br />backfilling and grading the No. 5 Portal area as indicated on the B-B' <br />baseline cross-sections, I find this to be satisfactory. The operator should <br />be clearly informed that the reclamation map does not show the anticipated <br />contours for the No. 5 Portal area on Map IV-10. The final cross-sections <br />drawn for the 6-B' baseline conform with existing topographic profiles and <br />approximate original contours. <br />In response to Stipulation No. 16, the operator submitted the mathematic <br />formula which was used to calculate volumes. The formula used is referred to <br />mathematically as the volume for the frustum of a pyramid and in engineering <br />derivation of this formula is used which is know as the prismoidal formula. <br />Use of this formula is an accepted engineering practice and is more accurate, <br />than the end area method.l <br />The operator has adequately demonstrated that the methodology used to <br />determine the reclaimed configuration is in compliance with Rule 4.14. The <br />information submitted is adequate to determine volumetrics and post-mining <br />topography. The information submitted satisfies the requirements of <br />Stipulation No. 16. <br />1 CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, p. 15 and, <br />Mo a an ouc ar ., urveying, p. 685 <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (30:t) 866-3567 <br />