Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 C O ]- O RA I~ O <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 D I v i s t o N o r <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 M 1 N &RA L <br /> <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />GEOLOGY <br /> REC LAMATION•MWING <br />DATE: July 31, 2003 SAFETY•SCIEN CE <br />TO: Steve Shuey Bill Owens <br /> Governor <br /> <br />FROM: Allen Sorenson <br />5 Greg E Watcher <br /> Executive Director <br /> Ronald W. Canany <br />RE: Over Burden Stockpile Stability, Lafarge Gypsum Ranch Pit, Division Director <br />Permit No. M--1998-014 Natural Resource Trustee <br />The Gypsum Ranch Pit sand and gravel deposit is on a terrace located approximately 60 feet above the Eagle <br />River. At the north end of the terrace there is a sharp bend in the river channel where the river is actively <br />undercutting and over-steepening the terrace escarpment. The location of the river bend and the terrace <br />escarpment are shown in Sgure 1 attached to this memo. The erosion has left a 60-foot cliff dropping down to <br />the river, and the Operator has placed an elongate over burden stockpile along the edge of the cliff The <br />geotechnical stability study prepared by HP Geotechnical and submitted with the original permit application in <br />1998 calls for "special remedial actions" if "occupied or critical structures are located near the top of the <br />escarpment." No analyses or remedial actions were undertaken prior to the stockpiling of overburden along the <br />edge of the cliff The Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) is concerned that given the inherent instability <br />of the escarpment, the stockpiled overburden may slough into the river. An inspection of the site was conducted <br />on March 14, 2003 to take measurements of the escarpment. The report of that inspection will be provided <br />under separate cover. The information collected during the inspection has been used to evaluate the stability of <br />the escarpment and estimate the potential for the overburden stockpile to fail into the river. <br />The critical, or least stable cross section of the escarpment is illustrated in figure 2. This is referred to as the <br />west profile because it is the westernmost of the two profiles measured during the March 14, 2003 site <br />inspection. The shear strength parameters for the soil and rock materials within the profile are also shown on <br />figure 2 and are estimated from values for similar materials found in geotechnical literature and DMG's <br />experience with similar materials at other sites. The results of slope stability analyses of the west profile are <br />attachment 1 to this memo. Analysis 1 of the west profile yields a safety factor of 0.99 for a circular failure <br />surface initiating near the back of the overburden stockpile and terminating at the toe of the sloughed gravel. <br />Any safety factor less than one is an indication of the potential for failure. Since the west profile has not failed <br />in the period of time since the stockpile was put up, the acting safety factor for the west profile must be greater <br />than one. The west profile was back analyzed to ascertain what the shear strength of the sand and gravel deposit <br />would have to be for the safety factor of the analysis 1 failure surface to be 1.5. The results of the back analysis <br />(see attachments) show that the gravel deposit would have to exhibit a friction angle of 51 degrees at zero <br />cohesion to hold a safety factor of 1.5. The results of extensive testing of similar deposits may be found in the <br />geotechnical literature, and these results lead to the conclusion that the Gypsum Ranch deposit does not have a <br />friction angle as high as 51 degrees, which means that the safety factor for the analysis 1 failure surface is less <br />than I.S. <br />A second back analysis of the analysis 1 failure surface was conducted (see attachments). The results of this <br />back analysis show that a friction angle of 41 degrees for the gravel deposit at zero cohesion would provide a <br />safety factor of 1.1 for the analysis 1 failure surface. It is reasonable to think that the Gypsum Ranch gravel <br />deposit may have a friction angle as high as 41 degrees. However, it is also possible that the gravel deposit is <br />exhibiting some cohesive strength. For example, the analysis 1 failure surface would have a safety factor of 1.1 <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />