My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31307
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31307
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:32 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:58:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977153
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/22/1985
Doc Name
REVIEW LETTER RESPONSE FOR ALBERT R FREI & SONS INC HAZELTINE PIT ADAMS CNTY MLR PN 78-153
From
ENVIRONMENT INC
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />~~ • iiiiiiniiiiiiiiiii • <br />Egviroq-qeqt, Iqc. <br />LARRY E. O~BRIAN <br />~R[~IDlNT <br />February 21, 1985 <br />Mr. David Berry <br />8989 WE9T 80TH AVENUE <br />ARVADA COLORADO 80004 <br />3b3-423-7287 <br />[~~CEIVED <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division FEB 2 2i°B5 <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 423 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 ~dINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Colo. Dept. of Natural Resources <br />Dear Mr. Berry: <br />Re: Review Letter response for Albert R. Frei & Sons, Inc. <br />Hazeltine Pit, Adams County - MLR Permit #78-153 <br />On behalf of our client Albert Frei and Sons we will respond <br />to your adequacy letter questions in the same format as they <br />were asked. <br />1. As per my conversation with Mr. James McArdle we do not wish <br />to file a Succession of Operator at this time. Attached is a <br />letter from Hazeltine Inv. Assoc.,Inc signed by Mr Albert <br />Frei, President of Albert £rei and Sons, General Partners <br />explaining why Albert Frei and Sons filed this Technical <br />Revision. <br />5~ 30 ~`° <br />2. f~Fe-eegfee ~ ~'~' °. Since the median averages '.lc9 feet or wider <br />making it a uniform minimum width of 38-feet acceptable. <br />3a Sic <br />3. Thank you. <br />4. We understand this and agree. <br />5. We base our reclamation costs on Doc. 1457 presented to the board <br />by the staff at the February, 1983 hearing as the source for <br />our equipment costs. Since the state is required to return <br />bond money not used for reclamation, we can only assume <br />that the Division would seek a bid for the minimum price <br />your tables reflect. You will note that in Appendix A-2 <br />" DOZE COSTS FOR SITE PREPARATION AT 83$ DOZER EFFICIENCY" <br />a ~~E with a push distance = 100' the cost per cy is <br />$0. In the same document Appendix B-2-1 SCRAPER COSTS <br />SOIL HAULAGE 83$ EFFICIENCY" a 641-B NE haul distance 500' <br />is $0.56 per cy. <br />We rounded the Dozer cost to an even 30 cents for ease of <br />calculation. This made the figure for backsloping $270 less <br />than it should have been. when we picked the scraper cost <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.