My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV99182
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV99182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:23:07 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:24:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/20/2006
Doc Name
2nd Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Colowyo Coal Company L.P.
Type & Sequence
MR83
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832$106 <br />20 October 2006 <br />Mr. Tony Tennyson <br />Colowyo Coal Mine <br />5731 State Highway 13 <br />Meeker, CO 81641 <br />Re: Colowyo Mine C-1981-019 <br />Minor Revision 83 -Second Adequacy Review <br />Deaz Mr. Tennyson: <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />-&- <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W, Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />The Division has received Colowyo's 30 August 2006 submittal of Minor Revision 83 - <br />plan to include buried topsoil sections. The Division has reviewed the submittal and has <br />the following adequacy questions. <br />The Division agrees that the exact locations of the test plots can be surveyed <br />in at the time they are planted and a map submitted under a separate minor <br />revision. The Division would, however, like Colowyo to provide a map <br />with the approximate locations of the test plots with this revision (prior to <br />planting). <br />2. The Division is still of the opinion that the physical and chemical properties of <br />the overburden will have considerable bearing on the plant response in the test <br />plots. Essentially, Colowyo is proposing to use a thin (six inch} layer of <br />overburden material as a suitable plant growth medium (over the topsoil). As <br />such, the requirements of Rule 4.06.2(4)(a) must be followed. Rule <br />4.06.2(4)(a) basically states that the use of overburden in place o topsoil is <br />acceptable if chemical testing warrants such a replacement. <br />Additionally, the Division is under the assumption that if the tests are <br />successful, Colowyo will implement this practice on a larger scale, as a part of <br />their overall reclamation plan. If this practice were implemented on a larger <br />scale, the requirement for testing the overburden would also be required for <br />use as topsoil on the larger scale. As such, it will be useful to adequately <br />characterize the overburden used in each of the plots. <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.