Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department u( Natural Resuurces <br />I S1 "S Sherman SL, Rwm 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 8020.3 <br />Rhune' (3031 8653567 <br />FA%: 0031 832-8106 <br />March I5, 1999 <br />Mr. William A. Bear Jr. <br />Bowie Resources Limited <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine <br />P.O. Box 483 <br />Paonia, Colorado 81428 <br />RE: Technical Revision No. 8, Nlining in the West Pod, Bowie No. 2 Mine, Permit No. <br />C-96-083, Bowie Resources Limited <br />Dear Mr. Bear: <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Grep E. Walther <br />Execulne Director <br />Michael B. LnnF <br />Division Director <br />The Division has tinished its review of Bowie Resources Limited's (BRL) February 1 1, 1999 <br />submittal for Technical Revision No. 8. The following are the Division's questions or <br />comments: <br />On proposed revised page 2.05-4, it is stated that two rock raises or shafts will be <br />constructed for the purpose of ventilation. Please provide more details on these shafts, <br />such as what the shaft diameters will be and if these shafts will have ventilation tans? <br />Please locate them on an appropriate map. Will there be roads leading to these shaft <br />sites? Also, please provide a bond calculation for reclamation of these shafts, if <br />applicable. <br />2. On proposed revised page 2.05-100, in Section 2.05.6(6)(x), it is stated that Hubbard- <br />Creek, Terror Creek and the power line are not within the permit boundary. Please add, if <br />you agree, that these items are also not within the adjacent area, as required in Regulation <br />2.05.6(6)(x). [n answering, please refer to the definition of adjacent area in Rule 1.04(6). <br />Concerning Terror Creek, please take into account that mining is being proposed for the <br />west pod. Also, for the sake of clarity, please add, if you agree, that the Terror Creek <br />reservoir is not within the permit and adjacent areas. <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />5'TATF, OF COLORADO <br />3. Now that BRL is proposing mining in the west pod, please comment on whether or not <br />the Terror Ditch should be included in Section 2.05.6(6)(x) as a structure within the <br />adjacent area. <br />