My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92941
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92941
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:14:18 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:25:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1974015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/4/1999
From
ST VRAIN VALLEY COMMUNITY WATCHDOGS
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.~ <br />A ~~~ <br />nsr~^~' :~ ,' . <br />"- _t~ '.. <br />(. <br />• III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • <br />St. Vrain Valley <br />Community Watchdogs <br />neighbors united jor Glenn air <br />P O Bax 82/Hygiene/CO 80533-0082 <br />online a! www.gearities.can/-watchdogs <br />Mr. Carl B. Mount <br />Senior Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Mount, <br />October 2, 1999 <br />RECEIVED <br />OCT 44 1999 <br />Division of Mineray g Geph9y <br />Here are additional public comments regarding DMG Permit M 74-015. <br />Batch Plant: Will the DMG delete alt references to the "batch plant?" This would be <br />consistent with the mine plan's provisions specified in county resolution 98-32. <br />"Whereas, while the original application also requested approval of concrete and <br />asphalt batch plants on the Subject Property as accesory uses, the Applicants <br />withdrew this part of their mining proposal." <br />Consistency of Documents: Respectfully request a review of Permit M74-015 and <br />County Resolution 98-32 for consistency of regulations, stipulations, and compliances. <br />See attachment for listing of some compliance issues presented to Boulder County. <br />Boulder County has not yet responded to this inquiry. <br />Can/Should the DMG grant any revisions without knowing fully the permit stipulations <br />imposed by the Boulder County? Are proposed revisions required to be reviewed by <br />the county and, if so, when? <br />Tree Plantings: In an attempt to mitigate future visual and noise impacts on the <br />residential community, applicants have stated publicly that tree plantings would be <br />forthcoming along mining perimeters Respectfully request a tree planting plan be <br />included in the DMG Permit. <br />Crystallne Slllca: How has the DMG responded vis-a-vis the Western Mobile <br />permit to the recently published IARC evaluations of the carcinogenicity of silica? Will <br />Western Mobile be required to have a plan addressing: <br />--Periodic sampling of product and determination of presence of <br />quartz and cristobalite. <br />--Plan to monitor and control ambient crystalline silica emissions. <br />"Protec! what's closes! !o your heart: your family, your friends and your lungs. " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.