My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-05-16_REVISION - M2000158
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2000158
>
2001-05-16_REVISION - M2000158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:57:04 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:52:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000158
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/16/2001
Doc Name
DMG memo regarding pit slope armoring
From
DMG
To
ERICA CROSBY
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • iii iiuiiiini m <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmem of Natural Resources <br />1 313 Sherman 51 ,Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 1303) 866-356: <br />FAa: 1303)832-8106 <br />DATE: May 16, ?001 <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SA FE T7 <br />TO: Erica Crosby Bill Owens <br /> Governor <br /> Greg E Watcher <br />FROM: Allen Sorenson & Tom Schreiner Eneeul.re Dtrector <br /> Michael B. Long <br /> Drv~sion Director <br />CC: •^I <br />Carl Mount, DMG <br />RE: Riverbank and Pit Slope Armoring Proposal, Technical Revision <br />to S&H Mine Section 112 Reclamation Permit Application, Platte <br />Valley Sand and Gravel, File No. M-2000-158 <br />The Applicant has provided a technical revision (TR) to further address concerns with erosion potential <br />through the gravel pit mining cells during a large flood event. The TR includes an illustration of <br />locations that the Applicant has determined to be sensitive areas with the potential for excessive <br />erosion. The TR includes a proposal and designs to stabilize certain of these potentially sensitive areas <br />by armoring through the placement of riprap. The TR also includes cos[ estimates for the placement of <br />riprap and a description of the timing of riprap installation relative to the sequence of excavation in the <br />gravel pits. The Division's review of the TR is broken out into four sections in this memorandum as <br />follows: <br />• The determination of locations that may be subject to erosion during a large flood. <br />• The specification and drawings that will govern the sizing and placement of riprap. <br />• The estimated cost to purchase and take delivery of riprap that meets specification, and to install [he <br />riprap in accordance with designs and drawings approved by the Division. <br />• The timetable for riprap installation, in particular the installation of the riverbank riprap. <br />As a reminder, the purpose of the flood control/mitigation plan is to minimize the potential for <br />excessive scouring and erosion of pit slopes and of berms protecting critical stmctures such as gas <br />pipelines, and oY offsite impacts due to sedimentation or realignment of the existing river channel. <br />Riprap Locations <br />In order to prevent excessive erosion. areas that may be subject to scour during a flood should be <br />armored. To identify areas of scour, the depth and velocity of floodwaters should be estimated and the <br />gradation of the soil and subsoil (sand and gravel) may be examined along with vegetation <br />characteristics to determine if the erosive power of [he flood will cut into the vegetation and soil. <br />Placement of larger and heavier material (riprap), that cannot be lifted and moved by t7oodwater, will <br />prevent erosion and down cutting in locations identified to be prone to scour. There are a number of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.