Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Memo to Erica Crosbv 2 May 15, 2001 <br />published computational methods available to determine the sizing and gradation of riprap required to <br />armor against erosive flows of different velocities. <br />Depth and velocity of floodwater increases exponentially in flood events of increasingly lower <br />probability of occurrence. The ten-percent annual chance flood (the so-called ten-year flood) results in <br />a substantially lower flow, depth, and velocity than aone-percent annual chance flood (the 100-year <br />return period event). Designs for armoring against erosion during a 100-year flood would most likely <br />fail during a much larger, but longer return period event. For this reason, a design flood must be <br />selected were it is recognized that the erosion controls installed are only intended to be effective up to <br />the flow rate associated with the design event. In order to provide a standard national procedure, the <br />one-percent annual chance flood has been adopted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as <br />the base flood for purposes of floodplain management. This standard is the basis upon which the <br />Division conducts many of its flood impact evaluations, consistent with nationally recommended and <br />established procedures. Extreme flood events with much greater magnitude than the one-percent annual <br />chance flood can and do occur, but with a lower annualized probability of occurrence. This is a <br />significant complicating factor for flood plain management decisions in that there will always be <br />residual losses from extreme flood events above and beyond those for which mitigation is cost effective. <br />In a submittal dated April 6, 2001, the Applicant estimated that 100-year floodwater velocity at [he <br />south end of the proposed S&H Mine will be from 1.5 [0 2.0 fee[ per second up [0 3.6 feet per second at <br />the north end of the site. Increased flows and velocity at the north end are due to the confluence of the <br />South Platte River and St. Vrain Creek occurring within the mine reach. As stated by the Applicant in <br />the April 6, 2001 letter, velocities of this order are not likely to cause erosion. However, the velocity <br />estimates of the Applicant are on a macroscopic scale, and can be considered an average velocity of the <br />large volume of water that would be flowing through the mine reach during a 100-year flood. On a <br />smaller scale, and in isolated locations, velocities will be much higher than the overall average, and will <br />cause scouring if armor is not installed. It is the potential for isolated high velocity flow that is the <br />impetus for the Applicant's riprap proposal. The TR application indicates that the data and estimates <br />the Applicant provided were derived from the South Platte River Basin Flood Study prepared by the <br />U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, dated April 1977. The Division requests that the <br />Applicant explain how the results of this study were applied to the location of the S&H Mine Property, <br />how the estimated flow rates, flow depths, and velocities for the south end and north end of the site <br />were derived, and provide the maximum flow depths anticipated within the permit boundaries of the <br />proposed mining operation. Copies of pertinent sections of the 1977 study should be provided in <br />support of the Applicant's conclusions. <br />The locations within the proposed S&H Mine reach that are likely to be subject to erosive flows during <br />a flood are the outside edge of sharp bends in the river channel, and the steep gravel pit slopes at <br />locations where the floodwater will spill into the pits. Recognizing this, the Applicant has identified <br />areas of the pit slopes to be riprapped that are along the south and west perimeters of the proposed pits. <br />and has suggested that riprapping may be necessary at as yet undetermined locations along the entire <br />