My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE35461
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE35461
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:45:01 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:38:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
4/27/1994
Doc Name
PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED REGARDING PROPOSED DECISION
From
DMG
To
GOLDEN EAGLE PERMIT RENEWAL FILE
Violation No.
TD1993020370005TV3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiuiiu iii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FA%. (30]1832-8106 <br />Date: April 27, 1994 <br />To: Golden Eagle Permit Renewal File <br />From: Daniel I. Hernandez <br />Re: Public Comments Received Regarding Proposed Decision <br />~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Ramer <br />Governor <br />Ken Salazar <br />Executrve Dueaor <br />Michael B Long <br />Division Dueaor <br />The Division published its Public Notice on January 26, 1994 regarding its proposed decision to <br />renew the Golden Eagle Mine permit. A request for a formal public hearing was submitted by <br />Mr. Robert Krassa, representing Raton West-Baldwin, Ltd., an overlying landowner. Mr. Krassa <br />submitted 13 comments in three letters dated February 22, 1994, February 25, 1994 and <br />April 5, 1994. <br />The following is a listing of these comments, the document where these comments may be <br />found, and the resolution of the comment item. <br /> <br />,: <br />Comment:'.'. <br />document <br />Resolutiori <br />1 . BasirYs permit should be con- 2/22/94 Addressed. The Division dis- <br />sidered anew permit, not a letter agrees. The Division believes <br />renewal. the permit renewal should be <br /> considered a renewal, not a <br /> new permit. <br />2. Basin's permit should be 2/22/94 Addressed. The Division <br />revised to limit Basin's access letter disagrees. The Division and <br />to exploration. Board are specifically pre- <br /> vented from adjudicating <br /> property rights. <br />3. Basin's permit should describe 2122/94 Addressed. The Division <br />all proposed surface distur- letter agrees. Revised Post-Mining <br />bances in accordance with Land Use Map 2 was <br />2.05.3(2)(b). submitted on 4/8/94. <br />4. A groundwater monitoring well 2/22/94 Addressed. The Division <br />should be installed north of letter agrees. A plan for developing <br />Purgatory River mine groundwater monitoring <br /> wells was submitted 4/21 /94. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.