My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE34045
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE34045
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:12 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
7/25/2002
Doc Name
Information requested
From
Greystone Environmental Consultants
To
DMG
Violation No.
CV2002010
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Consultants, Inc. <br />July 19, 2002 <br />Mr. Kent Gorham <br />RECEbi/ED <br />Senior Environmental Protection Specialist JUL [ 5 200P - <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />215 Centennial Building Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO 80203-2273 <br />RE: NOV CV-2002-010 -New Elk Mine (Permit C-81-012) <br />Dear Mr. Gorham: <br />By this letter, Picketwire Processing, Inc. hereby submits information and requests abatement ofthe <br />above referenced Notice of Violation for the New Elk Mine. The following provides information for <br />the points addressed in the NOV: <br />1. Failure to report field readings for May 2001 for PAW-1, PAW-2, PAW-8, and PAW-9 - <br />Field measurements for these four wells were collected, however, they were inadvertently <br />omitted from the report. Pages from the 2001 AHR have been revised and submitted under <br />separate cover. Measures to prevent this occurrence from happening again are presented <br />below. <br />2. Failure to report water level and field readings forNEW-2, NEW-3, and NEWS for October <br />and November - As reported in the 2001 AHR, no water sample could be collected at <br />NEW-3 due to the configuration of the shaft seal.. Since the water level measurement was <br />collected in November and reported in the AHR, Picketwire requests vacation ofthis portion <br />of the violation. The annual water level and field readings for the November were collected <br />for NEW-2 and NEW-4 as reported in the 2001 AHR. As a result, Picketwire requests <br />vacation of this portion of the violation. As for the October water level and field readings for <br />these three wells, these wells were placed on a reduced monitoring schedule when the <br />Preparation Plant Facilities were inactivated. Table 1.2-1 of the 2001 AHR has a footnote <br />indicating that "As the Preparation Plant facilities become active, the Division will be <br />notified in writing and frequency of monitoring will be increased as indicated". Since the <br />Prep Plant Facilities remain inactive, there was no requirement to increase the monitoring. <br />Picketwire requests vacation of this portion of the violation. <br />3. Failure to sample and report data for the annual sample forNEW-2, NEW-3, and NEW-4 - <br />As reported in the 2001 AHR, no water sample could be collected at NEW-3. Since the <br />attempt to obtain the sample was made and reported in the AHR, Picketwire requests <br />vacation of this portion of the violation. Bailing equipment to sample the other two wells <br />5231 South Quebec Street • Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 <br />Phone (303) 850-0930 • Fax (303) 721-9298 <br />Web Site:' www.greystone-consnltants.com • 8-mail: greystone~greystone-consultants.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.