My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV03496
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV03496
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:01:20 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:08:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/2/1998
Doc Name
MID TERM REVIEW RESPONSES FOR AUG 4 1998 COMMENTS NEW ELK MINE PN C-81-012
From
GREYSTONE
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR41
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EnvironrnentnlPlanners, Scientists, anAEngineers <br />September 1, 1998 <br />Mr. Kent Gorham <br />Senior Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO 80203-2273 <br />RECEIVED <br />SEP Z 1~ <br />DIV. OF MINERALS <br />8 GEOLOGY <br />RE: Mid Term Review Responses for August 4, 1998 Comments <br />New Elk Mioe (Permit C-81-O11) <br />Dear Mr. Gorham, <br />Attached aze three (3) copies of Picketvvire Processing, LLC's responses to the CDMG's August 4, <br />1998 mid term review comment letter for the New Elk Mine. The comments that require responses <br />are submitted below in the same order as your comment letter. Associated revised Permit Document <br />materials are attached and listed on the revised material summary page following this letter. <br />1. Material in Exhibit 33 should be removed from the Permit Document. Page vii of the Table of <br />Contents has been revised to indicate the change. This page was sent as part of MR-79. <br />28. Picketwire proposes to reestablish vegetation reference areas in other locations than currently <br />exist due to land ownership and control. Since the 1998 field season has past to acquire the <br />necessary information for this submittal, we request that if the Division provide at least one year <br />of lead-time so that the information can be gathered and submitted following the field season <br />of 1999. <br />30. The seed mix on Page 2.058 has been revised to eliminate Dames Rocket in the contents of <br />the Rocky Mountain Wild Flower Mix. <br />33. The first part of this question deals with road design specifications. The access road to the RDA <br />and access roads above the hoist house have been found to be in compliance. The light-use road <br />along the RDA conveyor is too steep to meet the requirements of Rule 4.03.3(3)(a). Rather than <br />reroute the road and create additional disturbance, Picketwire proposes to eliminate the road <br />designation. Access for maintenance of the RDA conveyor belt is necessary and we propose to <br />designate this area as a maintenance corridor. Past history of use of this area has been <br />specifically for belt maintenance and not for general access to the RDA area. Page 2.05-8 and <br />Map 11 have been revised to indicate the purpose of this area. Picketwire requests approval of <br />this designation. <br />5231 South Quebcc Strect • Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 <br />Phone (303') 850-0930 • Fax (3031721-9298 <br />Web Site: www.greystone-consultants.com • E-mail: greystone@greystone-consultants.com <br />,... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.