My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV03356
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV03356
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:01:10 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:07:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/20/1991
Doc Name
REQUEST TO REMOVE SEDIMENT POND LETTER FROM STOVER DATED OCT 8 1990 C-81-034
From
MLRD
To
JOE DUDASH JIM STEVENS
Type & Sequence
TR8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-- = <br />~II ~I~~I~~II~~~~~I~ <br />999 <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />Fn x: 303 832-8106 <br />DATE: <br />T0: <br />FROM: <br />RE: <br />February 20, 1991 <br />Joe Dudash, Jim Stevens <br />David BerryW <br />Request to Remove Sediment Pond - Letter From Stover Dated <br />October 8, 1990 - C-81-034 <br />~ Re 1 ~an~elo,n <br />~pf Cp~~q <br />r„~lo <br />QQ 0 <br />~i~ (~) ~ ~ <br />~fe 76 <br />Roy Romer, <br />Governor <br />Fretl R. Banta. <br />Division Direcmr <br />I have reviewed the above-referenced letter, in which Mr. Jim Stover requests <br />that we allow the removal of the sediment pond at the Red Canyon Mine. The <br />request is based upon our Rule 4.05.7_(2). It is ~ opinion that the operator <br />has not Drovided adequate information to allow removal of the sediment pond. <br />The following information is required before we can approve pond removal <br />pursuant to Rule 4.05.2(2). <br />The request must he submitted in the form of a technical revision. <br />2. A demonstration that the disturbed area draining to the pond is <br />revegetated and stabilized. This revegetation requirement seems to <br />be satisfied, according to Carl's memorandum dated December 13, <br />1990. <br />The stabilization requirement should be„specifically, and <br />separately addressed. This may be done by having one of of.':- <br />inspectors, familiar with the site, Drovide an assessment. <br />However, the operator should probably provide some type of erosion <br />survey which will address rill and gully development at the site. <br />3. A demonstration must be Drovided which clearly shows that the <br />untreated drainage from the disturbed area has ceased to contribute <br />additional suspended solids above natural conditions. This <br />demonstration is an absolute requirement; however, no such <br />demonstration is provided. <br />The requirement can be met by sampling pond inflow for total <br />suspended solids, for comparison with suspended solids data for <br />some similar natural drainage. We can also consider a model <br />approach if actual sampling is impossible. The operator must <br />develop a plan to make this demonstration. <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.